Closed Bug 376663 Opened 16 years ago Closed 16 years ago

Version/config bumps for 1.5->2.0 major update

Categories

(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P1)

defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: rhelmer, Assigned: rhelmer)

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 16 obsolete files)

2.77 KB, patch
nthomas
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
3.78 KB, patch
nthomas
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
 
Attached file proposed patcher config (obsolete) —
Assignee: build → rhelmer
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #260778 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #260778 - Attachment is patch: false
Comment on attachment 260778 [details]
proposed patcher config

Looks good. Maybe we'll being using bouncer2 by the time this goes live.
Attachment #260778 - Flags: review?(nrthomas) → review+
Attached patch add betatest-url (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Same as before, but add betatest-url. preed, I am going to land this (with cf's review) so we can get started, but please look it over when you get a chance.
Attachment #260778 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260780 - Flags: review?(preed)
Attached patch no ro on the 2003 side (obsolete) — Splinter Review
same as last time, -ro
Attachment #260780 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260783 - Flags: review?(preed)
Attachment #260780 - Flags: review?(preed)
Sorry (hopefully) last tweaks - details and eula urls should be 2.0 not 2.0.0.3, and I think the file should be called moz180-... instead of moz18-... since you're coming from moz180 (minor point I know, trying to keep it consistent).
Attachment #260783 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260788 - Flags: review?(preed)
Attachment #260783 - Flags: review?(preed)
Attached file win32 verification config (obsolete) —
Attachment #260789 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #260788 - Attachment is patch: false
Attachment #260789 - Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Attached patch mac verification config (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #260790 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attached file linux update config (obsolete) —
Attachment #260791 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #260789 - Flags: review?(nrthomas) → review+
Attachment #260791 - Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Attachment #260790 - Attachment is patch: false
Attachment #260790 - Attachment is patch: true
Attachment #260790 - Flags: review?(nrthomas) → review+
Attachment #260791 - Flags: review?(nrthomas) → review+
staging side is in experimental, release will be in e.g.:
http://release.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0.0.3/major-update/.../
Attachment #260788 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #261403 - Flags: review?(preed)
Attachment #260788 - Flags: review?(preed)
Comment on attachment 261403 [details] [diff] [review]
depend on new "major-update" directory

Canceling review, since we'll have to update this config when we do major update anyway.
Attachment #261403 - Flags: review?(preed)
Attachment #260789 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260790 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #260791 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #261403 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #263646 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Comment on attachment 263646 [details] [diff] [review]
15012->2004 major update patcher cfg

>-  <release 1.5.0.11>
>-    version = 1.5.0.11
>-    completemarurl = "http://stage.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.5.0.11/update/%platform%/%locale%/firefox-1.5.0.11.complete.mar"
>+  <release 1.5.0.12>
>+    version = 1.5.0.12
>+    completemarurl = "http://stage.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.5.0.12/update/%platform%/%locale%/firefox-1.5.0.11.complete.mar"

Need to s/1.5.0.11/1.5.0.12/ on the last line. r=cf with the version change.
 
>+  <release 2.0.0.4>
...
>     locales = ar bg ca cs da de el en-GB en-US es-AR es-ES eu fi fr fy-NL \

So here's an interesting thing, Romanian (ro) is a beta locale for 2.0.0.4. Should we add it to this locale list and hence offer a major update ? Or leave it off pending feedback on the quality ? I'm inclined to say that we should update the 1.5 users.
Attachment #263646 - Flags: review?(nrthomas) → review+
(In reply to comment #12)
> (From update of attachment 263646 [details] [diff] [review])
> >-  <release 1.5.0.11>
> >-    version = 1.5.0.11
> >-    completemarurl = "http://stage.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.5.0.11/update/%platform%/%locale%/firefox-1.5.0.11.complete.mar"
> >+  <release 1.5.0.12>
> >+    version = 1.5.0.12
> >+    completemarurl = "http://stage.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.5.0.12/update/%platform%/%locale%/firefox-1.5.0.11.complete.mar"
> 
> Need to s/1.5.0.11/1.5.0.12/ on the last line. r=cf with the version change.

Thanks!


> >+  <release 2.0.0.4>
> ...
> >     locales = ar bg ca cs da de el en-GB en-US es-AR es-ES eu fi fr fy-NL \
> 
> So here's an interesting thing, Romanian (ro) is a beta locale for 2.0.0.4.
> Should we add it to this locale list and hence offer a major update ? Or leave
> it off pending feedback on the quality ? I'm inclined to say that we should
> update the 1.5 users.
> 

Hmm.. I think we shouldn't yet. We'll do at least one more, and hopefully it'll be out of beta by then.
Attached patch as landed (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #263646 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Landed:

Checking in moz180-branch-major-update-patcher2.cfg;
/mofo/release/patcher/moz180-branch-major-update-patcher2.cfg,v  <--  moz180-branch-major-update-patcher2.cfg
new revision: 1.3; previous revision: 1.2
done
Actually, 1.5.0.12 needs to pull from stage not release :) Went ahead and changed it.
Attached patch verify config (obsolete) — Splinter Review
update config generated, here's the verify config
Attachment #263669 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Comment on attachment 263669 [details] [diff] [review]
verify config

All good. r=cf
Attachment #263669 - Flags: review?(nrthomas) → review+
Attachment #263665 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #263669 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #265159 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265160 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265159 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #265161 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265159 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265160 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #265162 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265160 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265161 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #265163 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265161 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265162 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #265164 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265162 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265164 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #265165 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265164 - Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Attachment #265163 - Flags: review?(nrthomas) → review+
Attachment #265165 - Flags: review?(nrthomas) → review+
Landed all thanks:

Checking in moz180-branch-major-update-patcher2.cfg;
/mofo/release/patcher/moz180-branch-major-update-patcher2.cfg,v  <--  moz180-branch-major-update-patcher2.cfg
new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4
done

and 

Checking in moz180-firefox-linux-major.cfg;
/cvsroot/mozilla/testing/release/updates/moz180-firefox-linux-major.cfg,v  <--  moz180-firefox-linux-major.cfg
new revision: 1.4; previous revision: 1.3
done
Checking in moz180-firefox-mac-major.cfg;
/cvsroot/mozilla/testing/release/updates/moz180-firefox-mac-major.cfg,v  <--  moz180-firefox-mac-major.cfg
new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4
done
Checking in moz180-firefox-win32-major.cfg;
/cvsroot/mozilla/testing/release/updates/moz180-firefox-win32-major.cfg,v  <--  moz180-firefox-win32-major.cfg
new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4
done
Priority: -- → P1
Done, shipped!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.