Closed Bug 379875 Opened 15 years ago Closed 15 years ago
Expose checkable object property
We may want to turn our internal CHECKABLE property into an object property "checkable"="true". Do we need this? Or are the roles sufficient? Checkable object ATK role Menu item ROLE_CHECK_MENU_ITEM or ROLE_RADIO_MENU_ITEM List item ROLE_CHECK_BOX inside a ROLE_LIST? Tree item ROLE_CHECK_BOX inside a tree? (Instead of ROLE_TABLE_CELL) This is separate from the "cycles"="true" object property which David Bolter fixed in bug 368012.
Comment on attachment 270862 [details] [diff] [review] We already have state in this part of the code, so use it to expose checkable there looks good.
Attachment #270862 - Flags: review?(david.bolter) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.