Closed
Bug 386668
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Add additional performance test suites to talos
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: mtschrep, Unassigned)
References
Details
Besides Tp/Ts/memory we need to augment our testing infrastructure with tests that stress different parts of the browser. Such as:
http://wiki.mozilla.org/Mozilla2:Trender
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/slickjq/
http://bubblemark.com/
http://trac.webkit.org/projects/webkit/wiki/JavaScript%20and%20DOM%20Benchmarks
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html
http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/innerhtml.html
http://xkr.us/bench/tables.html
We can look into borrowing some of these or creating our own new synthetic benchmarks. Ideally we'd develop a set of tests which each individually stress a particular part of the system so we can better understand the cause of improvements or regressions in the bigger benchmarks.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Some more sources of benchmarks:
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2152778,00.asp
Interesting technique to test actual page render time (by capturing video):
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/VideoWindowsBrowserSpeedShootoutIE7Firefox2Opera9SafariForWindowsBeta3.aspx
Some synthetic JS benchmarks. Try/Catch benchmark is questionable but the math, DOM, Array, and String functions look reasonable:
http://celtickane.com/projects/jsspeed.php
Updated•18 years ago
|
Depends on: talos-generalize
Updated•17 years ago
|
Component: Testing → Release Engineering: Future
Product: Core → mozilla.org
QA Contact: testing → release
Version: unspecified → other
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Found during triage.
Alice: are there some specific test suites here that we should add to Talos?
OS: Windows Vista → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Summary: Add additional performance tests to talos → Add additional performance test suites to talos
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Other than those mentioned in the first and second comments - so you'd have to sort through those list and see if there is anything in there that is worth while. I might consider this all to be too vague, so I could see closing this as INCOMPLETE and recommending filing individual bugs to request specific new tests.
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
Same as comment #3, but now I'm really going to close as INCOMPLETE.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Moving closed Future bugs into Release Engineering in preparation for removing the Future component.
Component: Release Engineering: Future → Release Engineering
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•