Closed
Bug 386841
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Crashreporter linked with libssl.so.4, libcrypto.so.4
Categories
(Toolkit :: Crash Reporting, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mehturt, Assigned: ted)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
3.58 KB,
patch
|
benjamin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Opera/9.20 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a7pre) Gecko/2007070304 Minefield/3.0a7pre Crashreporter program linked with libssl.so.4 and libcrypto.so.4, which do not exist in Debian. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual Results: Crashreporter does not work. Expected Results: Should be linked with libssl.so, libcrypto.so. ldd ./crashreporter ... libssl.so.4 => not found libcrypto.so.4 => not found ...
Updated•16 years ago
|
Component: General → Breakpad Integration
Product: Firefox → Toolkit
QA Contact: general → breakpad.integration
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Gentoo doesn't have these either. Simply symlinking them to lib{ssl,crypto}.so.0.9.8 makes breakpad work (AFAICT).
Severity: normal → major
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
![]() |
||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Hrm, I'm on openSUSE 10.2 and when crashing I get /mnt/mozilla/packages/seamonkey-2.0a1pre.2007070808.en-US.linux-i686/seamonkey/crashreporter: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory instead of the crashreporter - looks like that's happening on a broad range of distros :(
(In reply to comment #1) > Gentoo doesn't have these either. > > Simply symlinking them to lib{ssl,crypto}.so.0.9.8 makes breakpad work > (AFAICT). > Even when symlinking them to proper libraries, it does not send the report, but the error message does not say why it fails.. but it's probably not related
![]() |
||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
Actually, sending did work fine for me when I did symlink the .so.4 versions to the .so.0.9.8 binaries.
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Ted/Dave, who wants to take this? Linking directly against libssl.so makes me really nervous, but I'm not sure what the other options are. Is this a problem where RedHat distros and other distros have radically different soversioning for these libs?
Shouldn't applications link against static ssl/crypto libraries instead of shared libraries (for security)?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
We're just using `curl-config --libs`, which on my CentOS5 install gives: -L/usr/kerberos/lib -lcurl -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err -lresolv -ldl -lidn -lssl -lcrypto -lz I don't see libssl.so.4 in /usr/lib, I wonder if this is specific to our current CentOS4 build platform? Anyone want to test the builds from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/experimental/linux-newref/latest-trunk/ ? Those are built on the new linux refplatform, which uses CentOS 5. If this isn't a problem there, then this bug is a non-issue, since we'll be switching to that machine for the official builds probably this week.
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
bsmedberg $ ldd linux-newref/firefox/crashreporter ... libssl.so.5 => /lib/libssl.so.5 (0x00cde000) libcrypto.so.5 => /lib/libcrypto.so.5 (0xf7ca4000)
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
It seems to work ok if we just link with -lcurl instead of the entirety of CURL_LIBS. I'll have a patch in a bit.
Assignee: nobody → ted.mielczarek
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
This WFM, as libcurl pulls in those other libs anyway.
Attachment #271541 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 271541 [details] [diff] [review] Link with -lcurl instead of CURL_LIBS We should remove the MOZ_LIBCURL_LIBS configure check and do a AC_TRY_LINK using -lcurl.
Attachment #271541 -
Flags: review?(benjamin) → review-
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
Running UBUNTU 7.04, normal is libssl.0.9.8 Firefox nightlies since about 7/06 Same error, except called lib is "libssl.so.6" Somehow, we need the install to check for what is available -- or, of course, to link to a non-shared copy which we supply.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
The approach used in my patch (with the changes bsmedberg requested in comment 11) are the proper fix for this.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
Ok, this adds an AC_TRY_LINK -lcurl (inside of an AC_CACHE_CHECK) to configure.in, and then links to -lcurl in the client Makefile (as before).
Attachment #271541 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #272670 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #272670 -
Flags: review?(benjamin) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
Checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•16 years ago
|
||
This doesn't seem to have fixed it. I was pretty sure in my testing that it worked, I'm not sure if I missed something, or it never actually worked.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•16 years ago
|
||
Oh, I think I'm wrong. I ran `ldd crashreporter` on the CentOS5 system I built it on, and it lists libssl.so.6 etc. But if I copy it to a different system and run ldd on it, it lists the correct libssl. Please comment if there are any further issues.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago → 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
![]() |
||
Comment 18•16 years ago
|
||
Verified with Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a7pre) Gecko/2007071904 Minefield/3.0a7pre on Debian Etch and Sarge.
Comment 19•16 years ago
|
||
No, it's not fixed. Running ldd crashreporter I get libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0xb7429000) libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (0xb72fd000) but when I actually crash I get firefox/crashreporter: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 20•16 years ago
|
||
Works fine here now (Debian unstable). I tested it by running crashreporter by hand and also by sending ABRT to firefox.. However the crash report is still not sent, for some unknown reason.
Comment 21•16 years ago
|
||
Oh, whoops. Apparently I was a day behind on updates and didn't notice. Works fine here, sorry.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago → 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 22•16 years ago
|
||
verified fixed in 2007082304 3.0a8pre nightly build
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•