User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux; en_US) KHTML/3.5.5 (like Gecko) Build Identifier: http://irc.mozilla.org/ not listed here http://irc.mozilla.org/ either. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. connect to irc.mozilla.org 2. /join mozcrypto 3. look for wonderful crowd of people Actual Results: 4. cry at empty channel Expected Results: 4. helpful people enthused about #mozcrypto magicly appear.
sorry. the channel exists when people come. there aren't many such hackers, and they don't often appear on irc.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
is it worth documenting on http://irc.mozilla.org/ then?
i don't see why.
Component: www.mozilla.org → *.mozilla.org
OS: Linux → All
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
QA Contact: www-mozilla-org → other-mozilla-org
Hardware: Other → All
Version: other → unspecified
I think this is a legitimate complaint. #mozcrypto died due to lack of interest years ago, and today, none of the NSS folks even try to go there on any regular basis. So, I think the page should be changed to stop mentioning it, and should instead point people to the newsgroup and mailing list. I'm going to change this into an NSS documentation bug so it will show up on the NSS radar.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
The issue is this sentence on the web page http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/index.html To participate in ongoing technical discussions related to NSS, tune in to the IRC channel #mozcrypto on the server irc.mozilla.org. We really should delete that, and perhaps add a reference to the page where people can subscribe to the mailing list, e.g. https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
Assignee: nobody → nobody
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: *.mozilla.org → Documentation
Ever confirmed: true
Product: Websites → NSS
QA Contact: other-mozilla-org → documentation
Summary: url references #mozcrypto channel that doesn't exist → NSS web page references #mozcrypto channel that doesn't exist
Version: unspecified → 3.0
Created attachment 271951 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1 How's this?
Assignee: nobody → nelson
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P3
Target Milestone: --- → 3.12
Comment on attachment 271951 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1 This patch is more minimal than I had previously proposed. Let me know if it suffices.
Attachment #271951 - Flags: review?(julien.pierre.boogz)
Attachment #271951 - Flags: review?(julien.pierre.boogz) → review+
Checking in index.html; new revision: 1.74; previous revision: 1.73
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 11 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.