Closed
Bug 393820
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
expose bounds of accessible for accessible properties view
Categories
(Other Applications :: DOM Inspector, defect)
Other Applications
DOM Inspector
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: surkov, Assigned: surkov)
References
Details
(Keywords: late-l10n)
Attachments
(1 file, 10 obsolete files)
13.53 KB,
patch
|
mconnor
:
approval1.9b3-
damons
:
approval1.9+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Attachment #278373 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #278373 -
Flags: review?(comrade693+bmo)
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 278373 [details] [diff] [review] patch >+ return "x: " + x.value + "; y: " + y.value + "; width: " + width.value + >+ "; height: " + height.value; Doesn't this need to be a formatted localised string?
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > (From update of attachment 278373 [details] [diff] [review]) > >+ return "x: " + x.value + "; y: " + y.value + "; width: " + width.value + > >+ "; height: " + height.value; > Doesn't this need to be a formatted localised string? > Dunno. I don't care about localization a lot. If you think it should be localized I will. But should be x and y localized? though probably geometry language is not subjected to localization issue :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > (From update of attachment 278373 [details] [diff] [review]) > >+ return "x: " + x.value + "; y: " + y.value + "; width: " + width.value + > >+ "; height: " + height.value; > Doesn't this need to be a formatted localised string? > Though boxModel view keeps them unlocalized http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/extensions/inspector/resources/content/viewers/boxModel/boxModel.js#173
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 278373 [details] [diff] [review] patch >+ return "x: " + x.value + "; y: " + y.value + "; width: " + width.value + >+ "; height: " + height.value; OK, so don't worry about the l10n, but the indentation is weird :-P Here are some suggestions, since I couldn't decide myself: return "x: " + x.value + "; y: " + y.value + "; width: " + width.value + "; height: " + height.value; return "x: " + x.value + "; y: " + y.value + "; width: " + width.value + "; height: " + height.value; return "x: " + x.value + "; y: " + y.value + "; width: " + width.value + "; height: " + height.value;
Attachment #278373 -
Flags: superreview?(neil) → superreview+
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
I could see both transcription of x and y, as well as RTL changes for that string.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5) > I could see both transcription of x and y, as well as RTL changes for that > string. > Sorry, didn't catch you. What is transcription of x and y and what is RTL changes?
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
Transcription would mean that a localization in say Cyrillic would use the Cyrillic letters for x and y. And in arab and other RTL languages, folks read from right to left. Not exactly sure how that should look, but the localizers would know. Please don't add english strings to localizations, but remove them from the ALL_LOCALES in http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/extensions/inspector/resources/Makefile.in#47. We're doing this on purpose. As you're busting l10n anyway, let's go for the full monty. And I'd consider the boxModel non-localizable strings as a different bug, but a bug.
Summary: exose bounds of accessible for accessible properties view → expose bounds of accessible for accessible properties view
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
with Axel's recommendations
Attachment #278373 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #278767 -
Flags: review?(comrade693+bmo)
Attachment #278373 -
Flags: review?(comrade693+bmo)
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
That won't work for RTL. I suggest you use a .properties entry like # LOCALIZATION NOTE (bounds.label): %1$d is x (width), %2$d is y (height) bounds.label = x: %1$d; y: %2$d; I.e., the key value pairs should be one entry, and you can probably just use a single group for both x and y and get the output you had intially. If you prefer the output you had in your second patch, you should try to get someone from the RTL l10n community to comment on how to mark up the XUL so that it actually reverses the display. Sorry, I could have been more verbatim on how to achieve this in the first place.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9) > That won't work for RTL. I suggest you use a .properties entry like > > # LOCALIZATION NOTE (bounds.label): %1$d is x (width), %2$d is y (height) > bounds.label = x: %1$d; y: %2$d; > > I.e., the key value pairs should be one entry, and you can probably just use a > single group for both x and y and get the output you had intially. Sorry, how will the end output look? > If you prefer the output you had in your second patch, you should try to get > someone from the RTL l10n community to comment on how to mark up the XUL so > that it actually reverses the display. Do you know someone to cc? Also do you mean some languages may prefer to show value before label?
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
So, there are a few l12y (localizability) problems with your second patch: You hardcode the ';' to the end of the number. That may be wrong. I don't have any language using ';' semantically, but I wouldn't rule that out. In RTL languages, the display should probably look like ;456 :y ; 123 :x or so. Adding two RTL localizers for real input. In my suggestion, you'd get the string bundle, and then you'd do var params = [x.value, y.value]; return bundle.formatStringFromName('bounds.label', params, params.length);
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
with Axel's approach. I do not use %d because it doesn't seems to work correctly.
Attachment #278767 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #278786 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #278767 -
Flags: review?(comrade693+bmo)
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #278786 -
Flags: review?(comrade693+bmo)
Comment 13•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 278786 [details] [diff] [review] patch3 Yeah, %d is crap. Sorry, I was looking too much on js, and too little on idl (which converts all params to wstring, thus only S works). Anyway, I think you want to add a dir="&locale.dir;" to your <row>s to make RTL languages work, similar to what netError does. http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/docshell/resources/content/netError.xhtml#11 shows how to grab dom's global.dtd, too, which has that defined. The other way to do it is to use chromedir="&locale.dir;" and to make the theme pick that up, similar to what http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/browser/themes/winstripe/browser/browser.css#81 does. I guess that's only really good if you actually expect themes to do that, though.
Attachment #278786 -
Flags: review?(l10n) → review-
Comment 14•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 278786 [details] [diff] [review] patch3 Canceling review - please re-request once l10n questions are addressed.
Attachment #278786 -
Flags: review?(comrade693+bmo)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #13) > (From update of attachment 278786 [details] [diff] [review]) > Yeah, %d is crap. Sorry, I was looking too much on js, and too little on idl > (which converts all params to wstring, thus only S works). > > Anyway, I think you want to add a > > dir="&locale.dir;" > > to your <row>s to make RTL languages work, similar to what netError does. I should use @dir to get height, widht, y, x instead of x, y, width, height right?
Comment 16•17 years ago
|
||
Please play with it. Just hardcode it to "rtl" to see the effect it has, it's hard to describe. It "should just work" (TM).
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•17 years ago
|
||
correct?
Attachment #278786 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #279723 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Comment 18•17 years ago
|
||
I have since looked deeper and asked in .xul, see Neil's reply in http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xul/browse_frm/thread/99b59ef1f8a54fb9/482a36f9bb272622?lnk=raot#482a36f9bb272622 Sorry for the confusion, but could you test this in the original version with window,prefwindow,dialog,wizard,page,menu { direction: rtl; } in userChrome.css? That should mimic what localizers do in intl.css in general.
Comment 19•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 279723 [details] [diff] [review] patch4 Setting this to tentative r-. I'm waiting for some testing results from Alexander, see my previous comment.
Attachment #279723 -
Flags: review?(l10n) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•17 years ago
|
||
It looks correct with window,prefwindow,dialog,wizard,page,menu { direction: rtl; }. All is from right to left. When I append @dir attribute then the order is changed and it looks strange a bit.
Attachment #279723 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #292369 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Comment 21•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 292369 [details] [diff] [review] patch5 Looks good to me, you'll need domi reviewers still, not sure who'd that be.
Attachment #292369 -
Flags: review?(l10n) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #292369 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #292369 -
Flags: review?(comrade693+bmo)
Comment 22•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 292369 [details] [diff] [review] patch5 >+ <!ENTITY % globalDTD SYSTEM "chrome://global/locale/global.dtd"> %globalDTD; Not used? >+ <grid> >+ <columns> >+ <column/> >+ <column/> >+ <column/> >+ <column/> >+ </columns> >+ <rows> >+ <row> >+ <description id="bounds-x"/> >+ <description id="bounds-y"/> >+ <description id="bounds-width"/> >+ <description id="bounds-height"/> >+ </row> >+ </rows> >+ </grid> Isn't this overkill? Why not just format all four values in one string? accBounds = x: %1$S; y: %2$S; width: %3$S; height: %4$S; >+* locale/@AB_CD@/inspector/viewers/accessibleProps.properties (@AB_CD@/viewers/accessibleProps.properties) Nit: not in alphabetical order. >+accBoundsX = x: %1$s; >+accBoundsY = y: %1$s; >+accBoundsWidth = width: %1$s; >+accBoundsHeight = height: %1$s; These are supposed to be uppercase S.
Attachment #292369 -
Flags: superreview?(neil) → superreview-
Comment 23•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 292369 [details] [diff] [review] patch5 please address sr comments before asking for review again.
Attachment #292369 -
Flags: review?(comrade693+bmo)
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #292369 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #294050 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #22) > >+ <grid> > >+ <columns> > >+ <column/> > >+ <column/> > >+ <column/> > >+ <column/> > >+ </columns> > >+ <rows> > >+ <row> > >+ <description id="bounds-x"/> > >+ <description id="bounds-y"/> > >+ <description id="bounds-width"/> > >+ <description id="bounds-height"/> > >+ </row> > >+ </rows> > >+ </grid> > Isn't this overkill? Why not just format all four values in one string? > accBounds = x: %1$S; y: %2$S; width: %3$S; height: %4$S; Possibly, but it looks a bit better, there are some space between items. > >+* locale/@AB_CD@/inspector/viewers/accessibleProps.properties (@AB_CD@/viewers/accessibleProps.properties) > Nit: not in alphabetical order. Why? properties files are listed at the end. > >+accBoundsX = x: %1$s; > >+accBoundsY = y: %1$s; > >+accBoundsWidth = width: %1$s; > >+accBoundsHeight = height: %1$s; > These are supposed to be uppercase S. >
Comment 26•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #25) > > >+* locale/@AB_CD@/inspector/viewers/accessibleProps.properties (@AB_CD@/viewers/accessibleProps.properties) > > Nit: not in alphabetical order. > Why? properties files are listed at the end. There's no excuse to copy caillon's mistake in bug 109891 ;-)
Comment 27•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 294050 [details] [diff] [review] patch6 >+accBoundsX = x: %1$S; >+accBoundsY = y: %1$S; >+accBoundsWidth = width: %1$S; >+accBoundsHeight = height: %1$S; Nit: assuming you're only going to have one insertion per string, there's hardly any point using 1$ - %S on its own would do.
Attachment #294050 -
Flags: superreview?(neil) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #294050 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #294321 -
Flags: review?(comrade693+bmo)
Comment 29•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 294321 [details] [diff] [review] patch7 >Index: extensions/inspector/resources/locale/en-US/viewers/accessibleProps.dtd >+<!ENTITY descBounds.label "Bounds:"> >Index: extensions/inspector/resources/locale/en-US/viewers/accessibleProps.properties >+accBoundsX = x: $S; >+accBoundsY = y: $S; >+accBoundsWidth = width: $S; >+accBoundsHeight = height: $S; Note: these changes will break the build since other locale's won't have them. You'll need to remove them from the Makefile. r=sdwilsh with that fixed.
Attachment #294321 -
Flags: review?(sdwilsh) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 30•17 years ago
|
||
with fixed Shawn's comment
Attachment #294321 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #299963 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Assignee | ||
Comment 31•17 years ago
|
||
correct patch
Attachment #299963 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #299964 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Attachment #299963 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•17 years ago
|
||
sorry for the spam. this is the correct patch
Attachment #299964 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #299968 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Attachment #299964 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•17 years ago
|
||
sorry for the spam. this is the correct patch
Attachment #299968 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #299969 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Attachment #299968 -
Flags: approval1.9?
Comment 34•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 299969 [details] [diff] [review] patch10 a1.9+=damons
Attachment #299969 -
Flags: approval1.9? → approval1.9+
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #299969 -
Flags: approval1.9b3?
Comment 35•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 299969 [details] [diff] [review] patch10 too late for b3, especially with the string change.
Attachment #299969 -
Flags: approval1.9b3? → approval1.9b3-
Comment 36•16 years ago
|
||
why would a string change matter for the DOM Inspector?
Comment 37•16 years ago
|
||
Because DOMi is localized and shipped, at least in some locales.
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•16 years ago
|
||
checked in
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•