Open Bug 395084 Opened 17 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Values for <mail-urlfield> not getting reset on header expand/collapse, folder change

Categories

(Thunderbird :: Message Reader UI, defect)

defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Thunderbird 3.0rc1

People

(Reporter: alta88, Unassigned)

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6 Build Identifier: 1. expanding to full headers, then back to collapsed, does not set the collapsed=true attribute for #expandedcontent-baseBox. 2. switching from a news account folder message to a mail/newsgroup folder message does not clear the #expandedcontent-baseBox > label child's value attribute (website url). these 'ghosts' lead to incorrect results based on valid assumptions of header state. Reproducible: Always
alta88, do you still see this with early release (I would think so, but worth double checking before confirming) (backup your profile first) http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/thunderbird/early_releases/
Version: unspecified → 2.0
yes, both of these are still true. but since that new header is so bad, so egregiously terrible, i'm not doing any work in Tb lately..
given we are expecting (and are pushing) people and extensions to tweak the message pane headers, much desired I would think not sure which, blocking or wanted
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Flags: wanted-thunderbird3?
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3?
i suspect this blocks.
Assignee: nobody → dmose
Component: Mail Window Front End → Message Reader UI
Flags: wanted-thunderbird3?
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3?
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3+
OS: Windows XP → All
QA Contact: front-end → message-reader
Hardware: x86 → All
Version: 2.0 → Trunk
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 3.0rc1
As written, this bug describes problems from the point of view of the DOM. It's not clear what the actual user-facing problem here is, so I don't think this bug is in a state where we can consider it blocking at the moment. Can you elaborate on those and renominate if appropriate? Screenshots seem likely to be helpful here. Thanks!
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3+ → blocking-thunderbird3-
it's not a blocker, imo. nor is it user facing. it's just a proper software design no-longer-valid-value-should-be-cleared 101 thing.
Assignee: dmose → nobody
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.