Closed Bug 397204 Opened 18 years ago Closed 7 years ago

BeOS Firefox resource file contains inappropriate MIME-types

Categories

(Firefox :: File Handling, defect)

x86
BeOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: doug, Assigned: doug)

Details

(Keywords: fixed1.8.1.10)

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8pre) Gecko/20070919 BonEcho/2.0.0.8pre Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8pre) Gecko/20070919 BonEcho/2.0.0.8pre current resource file includes MIME-types for mail. These should not be included in Firefox resource file. They are appropriate for Thunderbird. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Assignee: nobody → doug
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #281968 - Flags: review?(sergei_d)
The proposed resource file should be committed to both the trunk and 2.0 branch.
Comment on attachment 281968 [details] Revised BeOS Resource File with correct MIME-types Doug, which way you made that file? - I see empty BeOS:FILE_TYPES in MSGG (Arhiced BMessage) section. Problem is that that section is most tricky part in resource for editing, as this is compiled and archived/serialized code. Thus, with GUI resource editors available in BeOS it can replace the strings there or section at whole in best case, all other operations are doubtful. I will try to create something useful ASAP, with some workarounds, though.
Attachment #281968 - Flags: review?(sergei_d) → review-
I replaced mail and news part of BMessage with image/gif and image/png which looks safe and quite natural :) Please test carefully if you really see those (and all previouis) MIME types in that section
Attachment #281968 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Sergei, I created the file using FileType Tracker add-on editor, then examined it with QuickRes to double check. I wonder what went wrong?
Doug, did you do it under Zeta or BeOS? I'm confused myself about situation, why Resourcer (most advanced resource editor) do not see those strings in your modernized file, while recognizes it in original FF resource file. And why I really see those strings somehow with QuickRes. Maybe you will describe procedure of that file creation with FileType add-on more detailed in our blog at livejournal or in private mail?
Comment on attachment 282000 [details] resource file candidate I've tested with this version. I suggest we use it instead of the one currently in the branch.
Attachment #282000 - Flags: approval1.8.1.8?
Comment on attachment 282000 [details] resource file candidate Moving request to next release
Attachment #282000 - Flags: approval1.8.1.8? → approval1.8.1.9?
Comment on attachment 282000 [details] resource file candidate taking comment 7 as a r+ from doug approved for 1.8.1.10, a=dveditz for release-drivers
Attachment #282000 - Flags: approval1.8.1.10? → approval1.8.1.10+
Thank you, Daniel! Sergei, would you have a chance to commit this change?
(In reply to comment #10) > Thank you, Daniel! Sergei, would you have a chance to commit this change? > 'll try this weekend
Checking in mozilla/browser/app/apprunner-beos.rsrc; /cvsroot/mozilla/browser/app/apprunner-beos.rsrc,v <-- apprunner-beos.rsrc new revision: 1.1.4.2; previous revision: 1.1.4.1 done
Keywords: fixed1.8.1.10
Thank you, Sergei!
(In reply to comment #13) > Thank you, Sergei! > Don't forget about verification to close bug at some moment, currently we marked problem fixing with keyword only
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Marked as fixed. Should we commit this to the trunk as well? If yes, I'll reopen.
(In reply to comment #15) > Marked as fixed. Should we commit this to the trunk as well? If yes, I'll > reopen. > 1)According to rules here http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Mozilla1.8 "# Add the fixed1.8.1.10 keyword to the bug when it has been checked into the branch # QA replaces that with verified1.8.1.10 when the fix has been tested in a branch build" 2)If we have hope to restore once our trunk (Haiku, Haiku, where you are?:) - why not?
I just completed a build with this fix in place and am using it as I write this. Hopefully QA will see this and mark as Verified. I'm reopening the bug since according to process, I closed it too soon. Sergei, if you get a chance, please commit to trunk also.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
I think this is will be ever fixed, closing.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: