Closed
Bug 397204
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
BeOS Firefox resource file contains inappropriate MIME-types
Categories
(Firefox :: File Handling, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: doug, Assigned: doug)
Details
(Keywords: fixed1.8.1.10)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
8.23 KB,
application/zip
|
dveditz
:
approval1.8.1.10+
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8pre) Gecko/20070919 BonEcho/2.0.0.8pre
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; BeOS BePC; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8pre) Gecko/20070919 BonEcho/2.0.0.8pre
current resource file includes MIME-types for mail. These should not be included in Firefox resource file. They are appropriate for Thunderbird.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
The proposed resource file should be committed to both the trunk and 2.0 branch.
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 281968 [details]
Revised BeOS Resource File with correct MIME-types
Doug, which way you made that file? - I see empty BeOS:FILE_TYPES in MSGG (Arhiced BMessage) section. Problem is that that section is most tricky part in resource for editing, as this is compiled and archived/serialized code. Thus, with GUI resource editors available in BeOS it can replace the strings there or section at whole in best case, all other operations are doubtful. I will try to create something useful ASAP, with some workarounds, though.
Attachment #281968 -
Flags: review?(sergei_d) → review-
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
I replaced mail and news part of BMessage with image/gif and image/png which looks safe and quite natural :) Please test carefully if you really see those (and all previouis) MIME types in that section
Attachment #281968 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Sergei, I created the file using FileType Tracker add-on editor, then examined it with QuickRes to double check. I wonder what went wrong?
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Doug, did you do it under Zeta or BeOS?
I'm confused myself about situation, why Resourcer (most advanced resource editor) do not see those strings in your modernized file, while recognizes it in original FF resource file. And why I really see those strings somehow with QuickRes.
Maybe you will describe procedure of that file creation with FileType add-on more detailed in our blog at livejournal or in private mail?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 282000 [details]
resource file candidate
I've tested with this version. I suggest we use it instead of the one currently in the branch.
Attachment #282000 -
Flags: approval1.8.1.8?
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 282000 [details]
resource file candidate
Moving request to next release
Attachment #282000 -
Flags: approval1.8.1.8? → approval1.8.1.9?
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 282000 [details]
resource file candidate
taking comment 7 as a r+ from doug
approved for 1.8.1.10, a=dveditz for release-drivers
Attachment #282000 -
Flags: approval1.8.1.10? → approval1.8.1.10+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
Thank you, Daniel! Sergei, would you have a chance to commit this change?
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10)
> Thank you, Daniel! Sergei, would you have a chance to commit this change?
>
'll try this weekend
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
Checking in mozilla/browser/app/apprunner-beos.rsrc;
/cvsroot/mozilla/browser/app/apprunner-beos.rsrc,v <-- apprunner-beos.rsrc
new revision: 1.1.4.2; previous revision: 1.1.4.1
done
Keywords: fixed1.8.1.10
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•17 years ago
|
||
Thank you, Sergei!
Comment 14•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #13)
> Thank you, Sergei!
>
Don't forget about verification to close bug at some moment, currently we marked problem fixing with keyword only
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•17 years ago
|
||
Marked as fixed. Should we commit this to the trunk as well? If yes, I'll reopen.
Comment 16•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #15)
> Marked as fixed. Should we commit this to the trunk as well? If yes, I'll
> reopen.
>
1)According to rules here
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Mozilla1.8
"# Add the fixed1.8.1.10 keyword to the bug when it has been checked into the branch
# QA replaces that with verified1.8.1.10 when the fix has been tested in a branch build"
2)If we have hope to restore once our trunk (Haiku, Haiku, where you are?:) - why not?
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•17 years ago
|
||
I just completed a build with this fix in place and am using it as I write this. Hopefully QA will see this and mark as Verified. I'm reopening the bug since according to process, I closed it too soon. Sergei, if you get a chance, please commit to trunk also.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 18•7 years ago
|
||
I think this is will be ever fixed, closing.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago → 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•