397619 - Another flock of l10n tinderboxens

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(mozilla.org Graveyard :: Server Operations, task)

Description

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

Dave, I'd need another round of tinderboxens created. Did you file that bug to make it non-cumbersome? Didn't find it right now.

Anyway, could you create l10n tinderboxens

Mozilla-l10n-%ab-cd
Mozilla1.8-l10n-%ab-cd

for the following locales?

bn-IN, fa, hi-IN, ml, ne-NP, rw, sr, ta

That's the list we have in the queue right now, not all of them are actually ready, but I guess that once you're setting them up, a few more per bug hurt less than a new bug every now and then.

The current real candidate is ne-NP, though.

Thanks

Comment 1

[Dave Miller [:justdave]]

Until bug 398050 gets fixed, this is a server ops problem.

Comment 2

[Dave Miller [:justdave]]

probably ought to be me that does this, but it'll be a day or two before I have time to mess with it because of higher priority stuff.  I'll leave it in the queue in case someone else wants to give it a shot.

Comment 3

[Dave Miller [:justdave]]

Since it got assigned back to me I guess nobody else wanted to give it a shot.  I'll get this later tonight.

Comment 4

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

Dave, can you move http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Mozilla-l10n-af-ZA to http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Mozilla-l10n-af, too?

Or rip out the first, and create the latter? af-ZA is the old code that we used pre-1.0, not sure why that's still there.

Comment 5

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

Ping?

Comment 6

[Dave Miller [:justdave]]

pong.  Going to try to work this into the upgrade tonight or shortly thereafter since I'll be messing with it anyway.

I was kind of stalling for bug 398050 but that obviously isn't happening fast enough.

Comment 7

[Dave Miller [:justdave]]

Axel: most of the existing l10n tinderboxes that claim to be trunk by their names are listing AVIARY_1_0_20040515_BRANCH for the cvs branch in their configs. Conversely, most of the l10n tinderboxes that claim to be 1.8 branch by their names are listing HEAD for the cvs branch in the config.  I assume this is all confused? :) Something to fix on bug 397298 I suppose.

Comment 8

[Dave Miller [:justdave]]

OK, this is all done. (The new trees and the af move)