User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:184.108.40.206) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/220.127.116.11 Build Identifier: this is basically a nasty doublefree in nsldapi_free_request when chasing referrals. if chase fails due to connection error and we call ldap_unbind to clean up nsldapi_free_request will free child request twice, once as part of freeing request list one by one and the second time when freeing child requests for each parent request. normally this doublefree is not a problem, its harmless and since standard libc free ignores doublefree in most implementations it happens without a trace however some allocators such as mtmalloc, umem, watchmalloc and alike dont take doublefree lightly and would either call abort() or generate some term signal explicitly as doublefree is not allowed in those implementations by default. this obviously does cause problems. below is libumem audit and transaction output that illustrates the problem: Status: ready and active Concurrency: 4 Logs: transaction=64k Message buffer: free(8098bc8): double-free or invalid buffer stack trace: libumem.so.1'umem_err_recoverable+0x39 libumem.so.1'process_free+0xe1 libumem.so.1'free+0x17 libldap60.so'?? (0xbff47bf4) libldap60.so'ber_free+0x74 libldap60.so'?? (0xbff293a2) libldap60.so'?? (0xbff292ef) libldap60.so'?? (0xbff3d6ae) libldap60.so'ldap_unbind+0x88 modify'do_modify+0x213 modify'main+0x3a modify'_start+0x7a ADDR BUFADDR TIMESTAMP THREAD CACHE LASTLOG CONTENTS 8071bb8 8098bc0 1da416de429a 1 8086010 807076c 0 libumem.so.1`umem_cache_free_debug+0x135 libumem.so.1`umem_cache_free+0x42 libumem.so.1`umem_free+0xd8 libumem.so.1`process_free+0x55 libumem.so.1`free+0x17 libldap60.so`nslberi_free+0x44 libldap60.so`ber_free+0x74 libldap60.so`nsldapi_free_request+0x192 libldap60.so`ldap_ld_free+0x15e libldap60.so`ldap_unbind+0x88 do_modify+0x213 main+0x3a _start+0x7a 807076c 8098bc0 1da416c2f4fe 1 8086010 0 0 libumem.so.1`umem_cache_alloc_debug+0x14f libumem.so.1`umem_cache_alloc+0x180 libumem.so.1`umem_alloc+0xc5 libumem.so.1`malloc+0x27 libumem.so.1`calloc+0x47 libldap60.so`nslberi_calloc+0x48 libldap60.so`ber_alloc_t+0x3c libldap60.so`nsldapi_alloc_ber_with_options+0x104 libldap60.so`re_encode_request+0x24e libldap60.so`chase_one_referral+0x3a7 libldap60.so`nsldapi_chase_v3_refs+0x178 libldap60.so`check_for_refs+0x193 libldap60.so`read1msg+0x4b7 libldap60.so`wait4msg+0x10e6 libldap60.so`nsldapi_result_nolock+0x111 the stack trace out of message buffer above maps to something like this in dbx:  _libc_kill(0x0, 0x6, 0x0, 0xffbfdc88, 0x0, 0xff30eaf4), at 0xff29fc08  umem_do_abort(0x1, 0xa, 0xa000000, 0x7efefeff, 0x81010100, 0xff00), at 0xff303dcc  umem_err_recoverable(0xff31064c, 0x41008, 0xff310630, 0xffbfdca0, 0x2c388, 0x534), at 0xff304074  free(0x41008, 0x246e4, 0x21b3c, 0xff29792c, 0x3dc20, 0x4c), at 0xff303938 => nslberi_free(ptr = 0x41008), line 1650 in "io.c"  ber_free(ber = 0x41008, freebuf = 1), line 327 in "io.c"  nsldapi_free_request(ld = 0x37bc8, lr = 0x3dc28, free_conn = 0), line 839 in "request.c"  nsldapi_free_request(ld = 0x37bc8, lr = 0x3dcc8, free_conn = 0), line 821 in "request.c"  ldap_ld_free(ld = 0x37bc8, serverctrls = (nil), clientctrls = (nil), close = 1), line 87 in "unbind.c"  ldap_unbind(ld = 0x37bc8), line 45 in "unbind.c"  do_modify(opt = 0xffbfe338), line 80 in "modify.c"  main(argc = 5, argv = 0xffbfe3b4), line 95 in "modify.c" Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Created attachment 284008 [details] [diff] [review] one liner fix this one liner should be safe to get rid of the doublefree without causing any leaks when freeing requests but i might be missing something so please review.
Created attachment 284009 [details] [diff] [review] context diff. same patch but with some context which i stupidly missed the first time.
Created attachment 284010 [details] [diff] [review] context diff. same patch but with some context which i stupidly missed the first time.
(In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=284010) [details] > context diff. > > same patch but with some context which i stupidly missed the first time. > Looks good.
Comment on attachment 284010 [details] [diff] [review] context diff. OK. I think this is a safe fix. Thanks for tracking this down; I am surprised we have not found it before.
thanx Rich and Mark! the credit for tracking this down goes to Pierre Rogier of our DS sustaining team. we have seen this as early as 2004 i think with our Msg server because they link with mtmalloc by default however it is rather rare in occurrence because it requires specific DS setup to reproduce. Pierre been able to put such DS setup in place and write the testcase for this.
Checking in mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/libldap/request.c; /cvsroot/mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/libldap/request.c,v <-- request.c new revision: 5.10; previous revision: 5.9 done