Closed
Bug 405184
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
"ASSERTION: How could we not have a parent here?" with <caption>, XBL
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Tables, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: bzbarsky)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, testcase)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
674 bytes,
application/xhtml+xml
|
Details |
Loading the testcase triggers: ###!!! ASSERTION: How could we not have a parent here?: 'mContent->GetParent()', file /Users/jruderman/trunk/mozilla/layout/tables/nsTableOuterFrame.cpp, line 119
|
Reporter | |
Updated•17 years ago
|
Summary: "ASSERTION: How could we not have a parent here?" with <col>, <caption>, XBL → "ASSERTION: How could we not have a parent here?" with <caption>, XBL
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Changed the <col> to a <div>.
Attachment #289990 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
See also bug 405186, which involves the same XBL binding and also involves tables.
|
Assignee | |
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
This is the same issue as bug 405186, really: we have a frame in the frame tree pointing to content that is no longer in the DOM tree.
Depends on: 405186
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
I saw this assertion with a build from last night, and I don't see it now that I've updated. --> FIXED by bug 405186.
Assignee: nobody → bzbarsky
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Should this testcase become an automated regression test too, or is the one in the other bug sufficient?
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite?
Resolution: --- → FIXED
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
I'd check them both in.
|
|
Reporter | |
Updated•17 years ago
|
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•