Update security page to reflect Firefox 2.0.0.10 release.

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

www.mozilla.org
General
RESOLVED FIXED
10 years ago
5 years ago

People

(Reporter: John Browning, Assigned: John Browning)

Tracking

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(URL)

Attachments

(1 attachment, 2 obsolete attachments)

(Assignee)

Description

10 years ago
Created attachment 290376 [details] [diff] [review]
diff file to update security information.

Update security page to reflect Firefox 2.0.0.10 release.

Updated

10 years ago
Attachment #290376 - Flags: review?(reed)
While you're doing this, can you add Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 to it.

Also, you should probably request review from dveditz, since that's who's reviewed this in the past.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true

Updated

10 years ago
Assignee: nobody → superjohnyo
(Assignee)

Comment 2

10 years ago
Created attachment 290427 [details] [diff] [review]
diff file to update security information, including Firefox and Thunderbird.

Included Firefox 2.0.0.10 and Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 in diff file.
Attachment #290376 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #290376 - Flags: review?(reed)
(Assignee)

Updated

10 years ago
Attachment #290427 - Flags: review?(dveditz)
Comment on attachment 290427 [details] [diff] [review]
diff file to update security information, including Firefox and Thunderbird.

I'm not keen on combining these two notices, they contain completely different security fixes.

Tbird 2.0.0.9 contains the security fixes like Firefox 2.0.0.8 and none of the FF2.0.0.10 ones (not that it needed them).

Sorry, but I think we need separate paragraphs for each. I guess they could be combined in the same "item" if it were clearer they were separate releases (e.g. a para for FF, a para for Tb, then the "users should get an automatic update..." para.
Attachment #290427 - Flags: review?(dveditz) → review-
Err, sorry. I meant to add Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 to the Firefox 2.0.0.8 note, similar to how it's done a couple paragraphs down on the page.
(Assignee)

Comment 5

10 years ago
Created attachment 290439 [details] [diff] [review]
diff file to update security information for Firefox and Thunderbird.

Added Firefox 2.0.0.10, and added Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 in the same section with FF 2.0.0.8, since the fixes were alike.
Attachment #290427 - Attachment is obsolete: true
(Assignee)

Updated

10 years ago
Attachment #290439 - Flags: review?(dveditz)
Comment on attachment 290439 [details] [diff] [review]
diff file to update security information for Firefox and Thunderbird.

r=me.
Attachment #290439 - Flags: review+

Comment 7

10 years ago
Should I check this in, or wait for Daniel's review?
Wait for Daniel's review.
Duplicate of this bug: 406873
Comment on attachment 290439 [details] [diff] [review]
diff file to update security information for Firefox and Thunderbird.

moa=reed

This looks fine. If dveditz has a problem with anything, it can be fixed post-landing, but I'd rather have this fixed now. I don't foresee dveditz having a problem with this, though.
Attachment #290439 - Flags: review?(dveditz) → review+
Checking in mozilla-org/html/security/index.html;
/www/mozilla-org/html/security/index.html,v  <--  index.html
new revision: 1.72; previous revision: 1.71
done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.