Closed Bug 410140 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Update calendar copyright dates to 2008

Categories

(Calendar :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: philor, Assigned: martinschroeder)

Details

Attachments

(3 files, 1 obsolete file)

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #365765 +++

After all, think how badly people would fail to be funny in the bugs they will file on 2008-01-01 if the nightly "of a _Calendar_ application!!1!" doesn't have the new year in the various and sundry copyright statements.
Flags: blocking-calendar0.8?
Assignee: nobody → mschroeder
Update copyright dates to 2008.
Attachment #294824 - Flags: review?(daniel.boelzle)
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Version: Trunk → unspecified
Update copyright dates to 2008.
Attachment #294825 - Flags: review?(daniel.boelzle)
It would be good if someone with the corresponding access rights could update all aboutDialog.dtd l10n files too. This would be easier than contacting each l10n team separately.
Comment on attachment 294824 [details] [diff] [review]
[checked in] Patch v1 (Trunk)

r=dbo
Attachment #294824 - Flags: review?(daniel.boelzle) → review+
Comment on attachment 294825 [details] [diff] [review]
[checked in] Patch v1 (Branch)

r=dbo
Attachment #294825 - Flags: review?(daniel.boelzle) → review+
(In reply to comment #3)
Yes, makes sense. Martin, would you mind to create a patch? If your cvs access doesn't cover l10n, I could check it in.
Attachment #294824 - Attachment description: Patch v1 (Trunk) → [checked in] Patch v1 (Trunk)
Attachment #294825 - Attachment description: Patch v1 (Branch) → [checked in] Patch v1 (Branch)
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> Yes, makes sense. Martin, would you mind to create a patch?

I'll create a patch.

Simon, can you commit it to /l10n? Maybe we should inform the localizers about this change.
Target Milestone: --- → 0.8
Attached patch Patch v1 (Branch-l10n) (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #295224 - Flags: review?(bugzilla)
Simon, do I need to create an additional Trunk-l10n patch, or can you apply my Branch-l10n patch where possible to Trunk-l10n?
Flags: blocking-calendar0.8? → blocking-calendar0.8+
Simon, please review the patch, so ause could check it in.
Comment on attachment 295224 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v1 (Branch-l10n)

r=sipaq

Martin, I would appreciate it however, if you could put up a new patch for checkin as s few locales have already made that change on their own.

So we don't want to risk messing around with their locale.
Attachment #295224 - Flags: review?(bugzilla) → review+
carrying over review from "Patch v1 (Branch-l10n)"
Attachment #295224 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #297345 - Flags: review+
commit done for 1.8 branch and trunk
Comment on attachment 297345 [details] [diff] [review]
Updated patch (Branch-l10n)

Checked in on HEAD and MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH

-> FIXED
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.