Closed
Bug 41140
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
-moz-fixed is no longer overridden by inheritance
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
INVALID
M16
People
(Reporter: rods, Assigned: pierre)
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [nsbeta2-])
Attachments
(2 files)
When input text or textareas are inside a div with different font-famly
specified they should pick up the new font. But -moz-fixed is longer overridden
by inheritance. This used to work. This used to be a special "property" of the
-moz-fixed font.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
This is important because you need to be bale to set a special inital or
default font for text control and be able to have that font overridden thru
style inheritence.
nominating for nsbeta2
Keywords: nsbeta2,
regression
Target Milestone: --- → M16
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Rod, I was looking at bug 30127 and it indicates that you can get inheritance on
an element with a -moz-fixed font-family, you just need to put a rule in your
document style sheet indicating that the font-family should inherit.
I'll attach a modified version of your testcase that shows how this works... I
think this might be the correct behavior, actually.
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
Thanks Marc. Closed as invalid.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
I am reopening this bug because it is still a regression, you didn't used to
have to do this. This approach means that users would need to explicitly define
that they want the font to be inherited. They wouldn't know this.
Look at it in this way, Joe-average-user write sthis html:
<form>
<div style="font-family:arial;">Hello<br>
<input type=text value="Hello">
<textarea>Hello</textarea>
</div>
then files a bug on mozilla because the textarea didn't display in "arial", he
would just assume that by specifying arial that it would override the default
font.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
Here is another interesting thing, it's related to this bug but may be a
separate bug. If change the rule in html.css to:
input[type="button"] {
font: button;
...
and then my example is:
<BODY>
<div style="font-family:arial;">
<input type="button" value="Default Button">
</div>
</BODY>
The button should have an arial font. In otherwords, the default font of
"button" in the html.css should be overridable via inheritence. I guess a
general rule is: font specifications in the html.css for replaced elements needs
to be overridable via inheritance.
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
Rod, I'm going to ignore you last point because I think it is a much bigger
issue than allowing -moz-fixed to be inherited over. Trying to break the
CSS-specified inheritance rules for *any* font value specified in the backstop
style sheet (even if only on replaced elements) is probably a recipe for
disaster, not to mention a violation of the specification.
This bug, if I understand it correctly, is that a font specified as -moz-fixed
should be inherited over as if it were not set at all. We have a chance at
fixing this, since -moz-fixed is a 'special', internal keyword. I'll look around
to find out how hard it is to special case -moz-fixed and allow inheritance over
it. We need to make sure the UI is not going to be wrecked because of this, so
maybe we should give a heads-up to someone over there?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
Hold on before doing anything, Marc. I think that Rod is wrong, I'm fairly sure
we always had to explicitely inherit the font inside text edit fields.
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
[nsbeta2-] would reconsider if you can agree on a scenario we should hold for.
Whiteboard: [nsbeta2-]
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Rod, like Marc I'm going to ignore your last comment because it clearly violates
the spec.
Back to the original point... We never had AFAIK the inheritance you are talking
about for the text fields font. During a long time, the font was hard-coded by a
custom style rule in the Editor. When that got fixed, it became specified as
"font-family:-moz-fixed" in html.css. The only meaning of "moz-fixed" is "Use the
fixed-width font which is set in the prefs". There isn't any particular
inheritance attached to it. The closest thing I found to that kind of inheritance
is in nsFormControlHelper::GetFont(). We used to have some code that caused the
buttons to use the fixedFont when the font face or the font size was explicitely
set on the parent (NS_STYLE_FONT_FACE_EXPLICIT) but you removed this code late in
January (btw, it means that the _EXPLICIT flags are no longer used anywhere -
which is fine with me).
The spec doesn't say anything about the font used in text fields, it's left up to
the UAs and their local implementations. We chose to display them with a font
that is set in the prefs; MacIE5 chose Arial; previous browsers have similar
choices but we can ignore them for that matter because they don't allow to
override the font. Having a default font on input elements is perfectly legit.
The appearance of these widgets is part of the look-and-feel of the application
or platform, we can display them the way we want. If a web site designer doesn't
like it, or if she wants a cross-platform look on her site, she can override it.
It's very similar to what we have for other elements such as CODE and KBD which
also come with a default font.
Now the contention is on how to override the font. You are saying that we should
be able to do so by explicitely setting the font on the parent element. Problem:
it violates the cascading rules and it is not justified by any Nav quirk.
Besides, I think it would break many pages because the text fields which used to
be in moz-fixed/Courier would be rendered with the same font and size as their
surroundings. As far as I'm concerned, I don't see any reason to change the
current behavior: it is correct and it's also what Microsoft did in their CSS-
improved MacIE5.
Closing as Invalid again. If that causes problems I did not understand with what
you are working on, please give me a call or just do another verbose-reopen on
this bug.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
Marking VERIFIED INVALID on:
- MacOS9 2000-07-18-10-M17 Commercial
- Linux6 2000-07-19-20-M17 Commercial
- Win98 2000-07-19-11-M17 Commercial
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•