Closed
Bug 416812
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Angular parentheses (〈 and 〉) are not rendered correctly on Mac.
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: dagan, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
1.45 KB,
application/xhtml+xml
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b4pre) Gecko/2008021004 Minefield/3.0b4pre
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b4pre) Gecko/2008021004 Minefield/3.0b4pre
This is a bug in Mac. In windows they are rendered fine.
See the attached file.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Include angular parentheses (〈 and 〉) in a mathml expression.
2.Open it by Minefield on Mac: their codes appear instead of the parentheses.
3.Open it by Minefield on Windows: the parentheses are rendered.
Actual Results:
See the steps above.
Expected Results:
To get the parentheses rendered and not their codes.
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
That testcase works fine for me on OS X 10.5. I do have the 'cambria' font installed.
What OS X version are you using ?
Component: General → GFX: Thebes
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → thebes
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
The hex box means that you have no font which contains glyphs for this character, so this is a simple lack of fonts, not a bug. My guess is that you have Arial Unicode MS on your Windows system, that font contains glyphs for these codepoints.
You probably don't want to be using these codepoints anyways, the Unicode 5.0 character tables list this note for U+2329 and U+232A - "these are discouraged for mathematical use because of their canonical equivalence to CJK punctuation". A better choice would probably be U+27E8 and U+27E9, these appear to be supported in a wider variety of fonts, although none of the default 10.4 fonts contain glyphs for these codepoints either. Try using the DejaVu fonts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DejaVu_fonts
Hopefully Stixfonts will solve more of your problem:
http://www.stixfonts.org
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Thanks and sorry for the trouble.
StixFonts indeed solved the problem.
Thanks again, Samy
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> Thanks and sorry for the trouble.
> StixFonts indeed solved the problem.
> Thanks again, Samy
thanks for taking the time to file a bug on something you thought was wrong!
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•