Closed
Bug 419578
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Add a "Recently Closed" history submenu
Categories
(Camino Graveyard :: History, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Camino2.0
People
(Reporter: stuart.morgan+bugzilla, Assigned: stuart.morgan+bugzilla)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 3 obsolete files)
908 bytes,
patch
|
alqahira
:
review+
mikepinkerton
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
8.21 KB,
patch
|
mikepinkerton
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
As a preliminary form of tab undo, we can create a submenu under history of recently closed sites, similar to the FF2 UI. Just keeping the URL of recently closed tabs/windows (rather than actually having restorable state of the window) should be pretty easy, and would cover a lot of the cases that undo would be used for (the "oh crap, what was that tab I just accidentally closed?" case).
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
I'm hoping to do this for 1.6; to keep that option open, we can land the string, and I can follow with the code after b3.
Attachment #305684 -
Flags: review?(alqahira)
Comment on attachment 305684 [details] [diff] [review]
localizable string
Sam and I both prefer "Recently Closed Pages" here, since this folder won't be history items in the same "linear-by-visit/pageload" sense as the rest of that menu. That extra built-in clarity also gives us a little flexibility in where we put the item in the menu, since we're getting the string in before the code.
This is another bug, but do we actually use the code that LocalFilesCategoryTitle belongs to?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Fair enough.
(I wondered about LocalFilesCategoryTitle as well; I'd have to dig into it some to figure out when it would be used, if ever.)
Attachment #305684 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #305691 -
Flags: review?(alqahira)
Attachment #305684 -
Flags: review?(alqahira)
Comment on attachment 305691 [details] [diff] [review]
string, take 2 [landed]
r=ardissone
Attachment #305691 -
Flags: review?(alqahira) → review+
Marcello, just FYI for l10n teams, this bug is another case (like some of the session-saving-related strings in 1.5) where we're going to land a string before the freeze and possibly add the actual implementation later.
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #305691 -
Flags: superreview?(mikepinkerton)
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 305691 [details] [diff] [review]
string, take 2 [landed]
sr=pink
Attachment #305691 -
Flags: superreview?(mikepinkerton) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 305691 [details] [diff] [review]
string, take 2 [landed]
String change landed on trunk and MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH.
Attachment #305691 -
Attachment description: string, take 2 → string, take 2 [landed]
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Smokey, want to take this for a spin?
Attachment #339692 -
Flags: review?(alqahira)
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → Camino2.0
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
We tried various locations after some IRC discussion; this puts it in its own separated-off section just above Clear History. While I'm not wild about the extra separators, this seemed like the best solution.
Attachment #339702 -
Flags: review?(alqahira)
Comment on attachment 339702 [details] [diff] [review]
v2
This looks good and works (almost) as expected; r=ardissone if you exclude about:blank.
I'll file a follow-up on excluding "Move Tab to New Window" from the list until such time it's just a view move, since conceptually it's not a tab close to the users.
Attachment #339702 -
Flags: review?(alqahira) → review+
Blocks: 456309
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #339692 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #339692 -
Flags: review?(alqahira)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Ignores blank pages, and all about: pages as well so we don't get things like bookmarks and history. (Yes, that means we ignore things like about:plugins, but since about: pages are more part of our UI than actual pages, and we ignore them in global history, that seems like the right behavior.)
Attachment #339702 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #339714 -
Flags: superreview?(mikepinkerton)
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 339714 [details] [diff] [review]
v3
sr=pink
Attachment #339714 -
Flags: superreview?(mikepinkerton) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
Landed on cvs trunk.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•