Closed
Bug 42177
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
list-style-image not relaid-out properly after image loads
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: mental, Assigned: clayton)
References
()
Details
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686; en-US; m16) Gecko/20000602 BuildID: 2000060208 If a page is laid out before a list-style-image image finishes loading, the resulting layout will be incorrect, as if the image had zero size. The loaded images are offset oddly and overlap. If the page is reloaded, and the image fetched from the cache instead of across the network, it appears that the image will be availible in time, and the layout will be correct. This bug might also be considered a crasher; Mozilla is very likely to crash if a such a page with a large list is scrolled in its improperly laid-out state. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. clear your cache 2. view the test page on a slow connection (or use a variant with a really big image) 3. reload the page Actual Results: Before the reload, the image takes a little while to load (expected :P), and the page is laid out before image finishes loading. The resulting layout is incorrect, and is not adjusted after the image loads. After reloading, the image appears instantly from cache, and everything looks like it should. Expected Results: At step 2, the page should have been relaid-out as soon as part of the list image was displayed (since the size would be known at that point).
Summary: list-style-image not relaid-out properly after image finishes loading → list-style-image not relaid-out properly after image loads
Hrm, if so, it would appear to be a dup, and fixed, at that. I'll give the 20000608 build a spin. Should have tried a wider search before submitting the bug; wasn't thinking of it as an HTML Element problem.
Could you retest in current build and mark as duplicate of bug 36703 if fixed? HTML Element is probably the wrong component for the original bug...
I'm going to mark this as a duplicate. If you still see the problem, please reopen the bug I'm marking it a duplicate of (with explanation, of course :-). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36703 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
Verified dupe; this works now that 36703 has been fixed.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•