Closed Bug 426799 Opened 17 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Check region/languageNames for untranslated strings

Categories

(Mozilla Localizations :: de / German, defect)

defect
Not set
trivial

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: kairo, Assigned: mozilla)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

I agree, Robert, would you want to take this bug?
I don't think I have time for this right now, sorry.
Alright, this is free for whoeever wants to contribute then, as I also won't have the time.
Attached patch patch v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
regionNames.properties was localized with checkin for bug 455749.

For the patch I updated languageNames.properties _mostly_ [1] according to ISO 639-2/B / the German names mentioned in sprachencodes_dt.pdf from Deutsche Nationalbibliothek [2], which was linked from Wikipedia.
There are some inconsistencies though:
a) Sometimes we use the suffix "-Sprache", sometimes we don't. If the policy is that we're following the ISO notation, then I think "-Sprache" has to be added several times ("Pedi" etc.).

b) "Mazedonisch" and "Oromo" aren't correct according to the .pdf, but the wikipedia entries mention reasons why these names should be preferred. How to decide this?

Feedback welcome.


[1] Not always. Example: Shall we use "Lalo-Sprache" instead of "Sichuan Yi"?
[2] http://www.d-nb.de/standardisierung/pdf/sprachencodes_dt.pdf
Assignee: nobody → mozrob
Attachment #543433 - Flags: feedback?(a.topal)
a) I think we should follow the ISO notation
b) Let's go with the preferred ones.
Attached patch patch v2Splinter Review
Updated patch.
Where the language names don't match the ones in the .pdf mentioned above, this is because
- of good reasons, IIUC ("Mazedonisch", "Oromo")
- I can't find those names anywhere else and so am not sure (ii: "Lalo-Sprache"? ht: "Haïtien"? nd: "Ndebele-Sprache <Simbabwe>"? nr:"Ndebele-Sprache <Transvaal>"?)

But maybe we can live with these nits, so requesting review.
Attachment #543433 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #548846 - Flags: review?(a.topal)
Attachment #543433 - Flags: feedback?(a.topal)
Comment on attachment 548846 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v2

Same procedure as in another bug some days ago: Here are additional review requests to our toolkit peers to make some progress with further discussion or even checkin.
Alex, if you want to have a request too, please tell me. ;-) I just wasn't sure because of L10n:Teams:de on wiki.m.o.
Attachment #548846 - Flags: review?(thomas.lendo)
Attachment #548846 - Flags: review?(kairo)
This is much better than what we have right now, so you have my r+ :) Thanks a lot for taking on this work, Robert. I know it's not the most interesting one, but I'm glad we have a consistent vocabulary now.
Attachment #548846 - Flags: review?(a.topal) → review+
Thanks!
Pushed to central, aurora and beta after talking to Kadir on IRC:
http://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/de/rev/54ca357c3fbf
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/l10n/mozilla-aurora/de/rev/315f444dc280
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/l10n/mozilla-beta/de/rev/00fdf3b4716f
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Attachment #548846 - Flags: review?(thomas.lendo)
Attachment #548846 - Flags: review?(kairo)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: