Closed
Bug 427906
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
ChatZilla activates chrome and javascript URLs in channels
Categories
(Other Applications Graveyard :: ChatZilla, defect)
Other Applications Graveyard
ChatZilla
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: bc, Assigned: rginda)
Details
(Whiteboard: [sg:low])
steps to reproduce:
1. paste javascript:alert%281%29 into a channel
2. click on the linkified link
actual results:
alert(1) is executed by firefox.
expected results:
?
1. paste chrome://browser/content into a channel
2. click on the linkified link
actual results:
browser chrome is loaded into firefox tab
expected results: ?
| Reporter | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [sg:low]
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
I'm really not sure this is a problem, but perhaps that makes me naive. I'd be willing to unlink the javascript bits, but I'm not sure if we should block chrome URLs. Anyway, relevant code is here:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/extensions/irc/xul/content/mungers.js#166
We can probably hardcode chrome: and javascript: to not work if necessary. Anyone feel like doing a patch?
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
I forgot, nobody can see this bug. Let's fix that...
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
It would be nice if people could file bugs that actually indicate what the damn problem is supposed to be.
The URLs are thrown over to Firefox using standard methods (openTopWin and openNewWindowWith), which ought not be insecure themselves. If the browser wants to block javascript/chrome URLs, those functions or something they call is what you want to 'fix'.
Hardware: PC → All
Summary: Chatzilla activates chrome and javascript urls in channels → ChatZilla activates chrome and javascript URLs in channels
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Sorry for not living up to your expectations. I won't make the mistake of filing a bug on chatzilla again. You are such a fine example and inspiration for all of us. Please keep of the good work of alienating everyone you work with.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Is it really too much to ask that people filing security-sensitive bugs actually say what the security problem is? Surely not...
Resolution: INVALID → INCOMPLETE
| Reporter | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Group: security
Updated•11 months ago
|
Product: Other Applications → Other Applications Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•