Closed
Bug 428406
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
contrib/bz_webservice_demo.pl fails with --product_name (Product.get_products doesn't accept product names)
Categories
(Bugzilla :: WebService, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 385283
People
(Reporter: LpSolit, Unassigned)
References
Details
bz_webservice_demo.pl fails when called with --product_name defined as it tries to call Product.get_product() with the product name as argument, but this API has been rename to Product.get_products() (plural!) and now only accepts a list of product IDs.
I think the current API is wrong! You have no way to guess the ID of a product,
and passing a product name to the API makes *much more* sense than passing a
list of IDs. So Product.get_products() should still be able to accept a (list
of) product name(s) alongside with accepting a list of product IDs. I consider this as a regression as it was working fine (i.e. in a "logical" manner) till 2.23.3. We should fix this API before 3.2 RC1, IMO. We should also fix it on the 3.0 branch as it won't break its current behavior.
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
There was never a stable release of Bugzilla that had the ability to get products by name, as far as I can see. I'm surprised that's the case--we definitely should allow it. However, it would be an enhancement. If it gets done quickly, I might take it for 3.2, but 3.0 is not open for enhancements (unless you can show me some stable release that had this functionality).
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
The demo script being broken is a bug, not an enhancement!
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Ah, yes, that's a bug, you're right.
Severity: enhancement → normal
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 4.0 → Bugzilla 3.0
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> There was never a stable release of Bugzilla that had the ability to get
> products by name, as far as I can see. I'm surprised that's the case--we
> definitely should allow it. However, it would be an enhancement. If it gets
> done quickly, I might take it for 3.2, but 3.0 is not open for enhancements
> (unless you can show me some stable release that had this functionality).
For the background for the current interface, you may want to review the history of bug 356816 :-)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
The Bugzilla 3.0 branch is now locked to security bugs and dataloss fixes only. This bug doesn't fit into one of these two categories and is retargetted to 3.2 as part of a mass-change. To catch bugmails related to this mass-change, use lts081207 in your email client filter.
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 3.0 → Bugzilla 3.2
| Reporter | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 3.2 → ---
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•