Closed
Bug 42844
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Does not pre-fill form
Categories
(Toolkit :: Form Manager, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jeziorek, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: smoketest, Whiteboard: [nsbeta2+])
1. go to Tasks | Privacy and Security | Form Manager | Interview 2. fill in your first and last name in the form 3. go to Tasks | Privacy and Security | Form Manager | Capture Data from Form 4. Quit and relaunch the browser 5. Tasks | Privacy and Security | Form Manager |Demonstration and click on amazon.com 6. Tasks | Privacy and Security | Form Manager | Prefill Form Safely - what it should do is fill in your first and last name where it says to -what really happens is that it says "There are no fields to be prefilled."
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
Fix checked in. Error was in the wallet tables, namely FieldSchema.tbl. Should be better now.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
still a problem using 2000.06.21.08 commercial opt bits. reopening. (followed steps in smoketest B.24 on http://www.mozilla.org/quality/smoketests/ .)
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
This is definitely working for me using mozilla debug build. Could you please test it again.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
it now stops responding trying to pre-fill the form in on Win32 comm. 2000-06-23-08-M17
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
What do you mean by "it now stops responding trying to pre-fill the form"? The original bug report said you get the message "There are no fields to be prefilled". Are you now saying you are getting different symptoms. If so, could you please be more specific. Have you tried this with a virgin profile? If not, please try that and tell me if you still see the same problem or if it then behaves differently. Are you getting this failure with both the mozilla build and commercial build, or is it a commercial-build problem only? Using the mozilla bild, I am unable to reproduce this problem. It prefills just fine. Sarah, are you able to reproduce the problem?
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
What happens now instead of saying "There are no fields to be prefilled". It hangs and you have to press ctrl+alt+del to get the window to close or to be able to do anything. Yes it changed symptoms. I have tried it with a virgin profile and i can still reproduce it. I am pretty sure it is just a commercial problem but i will check now and update you.
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
i cannot reproduce this problem using mozilla 2000.06.28.08 on winnt, using a fresh profile. (unable to test commercial bits at the moment due to other...issues.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
I can't reproduce this on mozilla build, but can on commercial. Can someone else try commercial to make sure? Thanks =)
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
OK, I just built a commercial tree and tried it. And again it works fine for me. :-/
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
i'm being blocked by that Activation bug (http://bugscape.mcom.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350), so i cannot test this on the commercial bits.
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
I'm being blocked here by lack of definitive statements from Q/A. I have not been able to reproduce this on either a commercial or a mozilla build. Jazeriok reports that he can reproduce it on commercial but not mozilla. Sarah reports that she cannot reproduce on mozilla but is currently unable to try it on commercial. Until I get more info from Sarah, there is nothing further that I can do here.
Target Milestone: --- → M17
Updated•24 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
When testing on commercial try on windows 98. There is sometimes a difference between NT and win 98. I can still reproduce this everytime on Win32 comm. 2000-07-05-08-M17
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
Sarah, I really need for you to let me know if you can reproduce this problem. I am unable to do so and I need to be able to determine if it is a real bug or some anomoly on Alek's machine.
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
Have not received independent verification from sairuh. Until I do, I am assuming this is an anomoly on Alek's machine and marking this was works-for-me.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
hallo steve & alek --i've returned from vacation, and y'day i was swamped with the email deluge. hence, i've only gotten to this till now. anyways... :-) bugscape issue #1350 was finally fixed and verified only recently, so now am testing using the commercial 2000.07.11.08-m17 [optimized] bits on my winNT box (using a fresh profile, too!). 1. went to the Interview page and captured the form data (via Tasks > etc etc > Capture Data found on Form). 2. i verified that the data was successfully captured by viewing the data in the Stored Form Data dialog --it contained the sane field names of name.first and name.last (tho' you need to click in the Values list box to see the actual value --known bug). 3. went to the Demonstration page and selected the amazon.com sample form. i then successfully prefilled the form, too (via Tasks > etc etc > Prefill Form with Captured Data). in light of this experience, i'm gonna verify this as WFM... Alek, have you tried to reproduce your problem on another winNT and/or win98 machines (there are more machines in the QA labs; claudius and jrgm might also have additional machines for you to test on, too)?
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
I checked on another Win98 machine and it worked with build 2000-07-11-08-M17 commercial
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
Adding keyword to bugs which already show a nsbeta2 triage value in the status whiteboard so the queries don't get screwed up.
Keywords: nsbeta2
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: morse → nobody
Product: Core → Toolkit
QA Contact: bugzilla → form.manager
Target Milestone: M17 → ---
Version: Trunk → unspecified
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•