Closed
Bug 431578
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
"See All Versions" padded with a bit too much dead space around it
Categories
(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Public Pages, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
3.4.2
People
(Reporter: davemgarrett, Assigned: cpollett)
Details
(Keywords: polish)
Attachments
(4 files, 3 obsolete files)
|
27.73 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
2.13 KB,
patch
|
morgamic
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
3.55 KB,
patch
|
morgamic
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
1.57 KB,
patch
|
laura
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008042904 Minefield/3.0pre
Build Identifier:
Currently we have the "see all versions" link (added in bug 425477) between the compatibility range(s) (added in bug 425539) and support section (added in bug 425510) with 2 blank lines on either side. This looks a little out of place with the overall layout. I suggest simply moving this link to the right of the compatibility range(s), as that has quite a bit of empty space to its side. This would get rid of some of this odd new white space on the right that's been added with these two new features.
Not a drastic change mind you, but I think it looks a bit better without all that extra space. At far least, those extra two blank lines around the link don't need to be there.
Reproducible: Always
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
This is a minor tweak, so it could theoretically be put in 3.4.1, but my guess is it'd really be marked for 3.4.2 if it was to be accepted. Comments?
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is a minor tweak, so it could theoretically be put in 3.4.1, but my guess
> is it'd really be marked for 3.4.2 if it was to be accepted. Comments?
>
Your guess is correct. :)
I like the idea - madhava, thoughts?
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
I like this idea too. I definitely agree -- the current spacing looks a bit odd, but also gets in the way of people associating the two items as being related.
My only concern about moving the link to the far right is that people won't notice it as much when scanning down the page. What about to the right of the text block, but not all the way over? I'll attach a mockup
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
oh, I've made the link text a little smaller, too, so that it's not bigger than the section headers.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
> oh, I've made the link text a little smaller, too, so that it's not bigger than
> the section headers.
Yeah, the text looks better like that.
I agree, that position looks good there too. Though, I'd suggest centering it vertically along-side the "works with" box. (would look odd if multiple ranges are shown, assuming that ever gets done)
If you're worried about it being easily noticed, you could give it a faint button appearance to make it stand out more.
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
This seems like a pretty quick fix; dropping into 3.4.2 and assigning to cpollett. If you don't have time, feel free to reassign to me.
Assignee: nobody → cpollett
Target Milestone: --- → 3.4.2
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
The changes to the helper with this patch are because I notice when viewing the page in hebrew (to check my patch works for an rtl language), I noticed this helper was generating warnings about something not being an array.
Attachment #320017 -
Flags: review?
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320017 -
Flags: review? → review?(laura)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
There's a lot of nothing changes in that diff. (the first is whitespace, but I don't see anything on many of the others) A bit hard to find the actual changes in there. :/
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #320017 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #320104 -
Flags: review?
Attachment #320017 -
Flags: review?(laura)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #320635 -
Flags: review?
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320635 -
Flags: review? → review?(fwenzel)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320635 -
Flags: review?(fwenzel) → review?(morgamic)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320635 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #320635 -
Flags: review?(morgamic)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320635 -
Attachment is obsolete: false
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320104 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #320104 -
Flags: review?
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320635 -
Flags: review?(morgamic)
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 320635 [details] [diff] [review]
oops. forgot to assign anyone to review my last patch and has gone stale
Works for me.
Attachment #320635 -
Flags: review?(morgamic) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•17 years ago
|
||
checked in r13060
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Verified FIXED; we vertically centered this intentionally (comment 6).
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Version: unspecified → 3.2
| Reporter | ||
Comment 15•17 years ago
|
||
I thought we were going with the positioning and text size suggested in comment #5 by Madhava? This aligns to the right and the size is unchanged.
https://preview.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5791
| Reporter | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
| Reporter | ||
Comment 16•17 years ago
|
||
and comment #4 had the reasoning:
> My only concern about moving the link to the far right is that people won't
> notice it as much when scanning down the page. What about to the right of the
> text block, but not all the way over?
This current patch just moves the link from one odd place to another. (granted, it's better) REOPENED requesting it be moved over and resized to resemble Madhava's mockup. (attachment 318888 [details])
| Reporter | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #318658 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Assignee | ||
Comment 17•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #320646 -
Flags: review?(morgamic)
Comment 18•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 320646 [details] [diff] [review]
okay. tried to duplicate what madhava had as exactly as I could
Also works for me.
Attachment #320646 -
Flags: review?(morgamic) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 19•17 years ago
|
||
checked into r13068
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago → 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
I think it looks slightly worse now, as the arrow graphic is clipped; still doesn't align correctly :-(
| Reporter | ||
Comment 21•17 years ago
|
||
I hate to do this... but yeah, it's cutoff now.
REOPENED again. :p
Text is a little bit better. Could probably also be made bold. Maybe just use the same CSS as the text for the download button?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
| Assignee | ||
Comment 22•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #320717 -
Flags: review?
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320717 -
Flags: review? → review?(laura)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320717 -
Flags: review?(laura) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 23•17 years ago
|
||
checked into r13089
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago → 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 24•17 years ago
|
||
Beautiful. Let the nitpicking end. :)
VERIFIED FIXED
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: push-needed
| Reporter | ||
Comment 25•17 years ago
|
||
Though... I am now noticing that that image is shown a couple pixels low... I'm just saying... :p
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: push-needed
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•