Closed
Bug 431726
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Create two new win32 VMs from win2k3sp2-ref-vm
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: joduinn, Unassigned)
References
Details
Can you please create a new win32 VM, called moz2-win32-slave2.build.mozilla.org?
Note: while the usual linux VM has three disks 9.7gb/20gb/15gb, can you pls create this new VM with slightly larger 3rd disk of 30gb? ie create 9.7gb/20gb/30gb disks?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Actually, we need two VMs. Can you also create a moz2-win32-slave3.build.mozilla.org same as above?
Summary: Create new win32 VM from win2k3sp2-ref-vm → Create two new win32 VMs from win2k3sp2-ref-vm
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: server-ops → mrz
Updated•17 years ago
|
Whiteboard: pending bm-vmware03
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
moz2-win32-slave02 IN A 10.2.71.118
moz2-win32-slave03 IN A 10.2.71.119
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Boxes are up on the ESX 3.5 server with updated vmware-tools. I haven't ever created the extra drives - that's been something you guys have done so I'll leave that for you.
Create the drives on netapp-d-fcal1.
Assignee: mrz → nobody
Component: Server Operations → Release Engineering
QA Contact: justin → release
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
For both of these VMs, I've added the additional drives. Each slave now has 9.7gb/20gb/30gb drives, created on netapp-d-fcall. I've also verified that the independent checkbox is unchecked (see details in bug#425291).
mrz: does it look ok, or did I miss anything? Just want to sanity check before we start doing work on these VMs.
Whiteboard: pending bm-vmware03
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
mrz just gave these a once over, all looked ok. Talked with mrz and nthomas about next steps in terms of setup for NTFS vs FAT32. I've now formatted up both of these machines as follows:
C: NTFS (9.7gb)
D: NTFS (20gb)
E: FAT32 (30gb)
F: cdrom
Closing this bug. Bug#431755 tracks installing rest of toolchain and buildbot.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
The CDROM really breaks vmotion - do you really need it?
I ran into quite a few that had an attached ISO that I had to remove before vmotion would work.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> The CDROM really breaks vmotion - do you really need it?
> I ran into quite a few that had an attached ISO that I had to remove before
> vmotion would work.
Nope, no need for CDROM, so feel free to remove if that makes your life easier.
The cdrom has always been in the refimage historically, but as bhearsum pointed out in email, we can always add it later if we ever find a situation where we need it!
| Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•