Closed
Bug 434996
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Print fails CSS2.1 absolute positioning for paged media
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: simo.hellsten, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5) Gecko/2008050509 Firefox/3.0b5
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5) Gecko/2008050509 Firefox/3.0b5
Printing fails to respect CSS 2.1 position:absolute coordinates defined for paged media. Element is positioned instead at the top of page, printed on top of everything else.
The page is valid XHTML 1.0 Strict with CSS 2.1
Printing works as expected on Firefox 2.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Print
Actual Results:
Positioned element is positioned incorrectly / ignoring positioning coordinates
Expected Results:
Element positioned according to CSS
Some forums recommended disabling Xulrunner. This appears to have no effect on the result.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
More detail: The bug appears to concern only positions affected by page height. See another example:
http://www.kulma.net/simo/example/example2.html
Positioning by percentage of height fails (top:50% and bottom:50%) as fails also positioning by distance from bottom of the page (bottom:50pt).
All this does work with Firefox 2
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Since Ubuntu now has version 3.0, just to add that this bug still exists in Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008061015 Firefox/3.0
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Anybody got an idea how difficult a bug this is?
Since it worked (works) perfectly on FF2 I wonder if I would be able to fix it myself, now that I'm back at the univerity and a bit more into programming... How much the CSS stuff changed from FF2 to FF3?
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.9) Gecko/2009042113 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/3.0.9
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
This seems to work on FireFox 3.5, so I guess it is no longer important...
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
WFM based off of comment 4
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Version: unspecified → 3.0 Branch
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•