Closed Bug 451906 Opened 16 years ago Closed 16 years ago

Regression: Array index has different results

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect, P1)

defect

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED
mozilla1.9.1

People

(Reporter: sroussey, Assigned: brendan)

References

Details

(4 keywords)

Attachments

(1 file)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 Build Identifier: Indexing an array by number, if that number is then quoted, results in undefined, where all previous versions of Firefox (as well as IE, Safari, etc) implicitly convert the number string into a number for the index and return that part of the array. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: var s=[1,2,3] console.log(s['1') Actual Results: undefined Expected Results: 2
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
This should block 1.9.1. /be
Severity: major → critical
OS: Windows Vista → All
Hardware: PC → All
Flags: blocking1.9.1+
Attached patch fixSplinter Review
if (is_special_case) { special_case(); } else { normal_case(); } when you want to split special_case() into a more special version of itself and a variation on normal_case() becomes do { if (is_special_case) { if (extra_special) { special_case(); break; } setup_variation_on_normal_case(); } normal_case(); } while (0); Maximum code sharing without goto. /be
Assignee: general → brendan
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #335403 - Flags: review?(shaver)
Want this in the next possible patch release too. /be
Priority: -- → P1
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.1
Comment on attachment 335403 [details] [diff] [review] fix r=shaver; need test coverage here, for sure.
Attachment #335403 - Flags: review?(shaver) → review+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment on attachment 335403 [details] [diff] [review] fix Can this make it for 1.9.0.2? /be
Attachment #335403 - Flags: approval1.9.0.2?
bc: you should holler harder when we break stuff ;-). Sam: this is covered by the js testsuite -- we just didn't act on the bug bc filed, due to heads-down TM hacking. This is a pretty bad regression, and the fix should go into the next Firefox 3.0.x. /be
actually, js1_5/Array/regress-107138.js didn't show a failure on 1.9.0 for me. :-( I figured you saw my bug mail about the regressions on MC/TM. But I'll speak up more.
Flags: in-testsuite?
Flags: in-litmus-
Comment on attachment 335403 [details] [diff] [review] fix Approved for 1.9.0.2. Please land in CVS ASAP (code freeze is tonight at midnight PDT). a=ss Note: I'm approving this knowing that any new tests that need to be created for it will get created shortly by Bob.
Attachment #335403 - Flags: approval1.9.0.2? → approval1.9.0.2+
Lands cleanly with no more than a name-change, so that's what I did: Checking in jsparse.c; /cvsroot/mozilla/js/src/jsparse.c,v <-- jsparse.c new revision: 3.349; previous revision: 3.348 done
Keywords: fixed1.9.0.2
Keywords: regression
Depends on: 452369
Steve, this was with Firebug correct? I can't reproduce this on mac or windows with Firefox 3.0.1 and Firebug 1.2. Does anyone have a shell test that illustrates the bug on 1.9.0?
Wasn't in 3.0.1 or I think a lot of people would have complained. ;) Was in Minefield when i discovered it (3.1a2pre of the bug report date).
That wasn't clear from the build info in the original report. The regression on 1.9.1 is covered by the duped bug's test. Brendan, what did you fix on 1.9.0?
Keywords: testcase
/cvsroot/mozilla/js/tests/js1_5/Array/regress-451906.js,v <-- regress-451906.js initial revision: 1.1 http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f0e9fd501e63
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite+
v 1.9.0, 1.9.1 1.9.2
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: