Closed
Bug 462177
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
fix builder names for Mozilla-l10n (1.9.0)
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P3)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Assigned: nthomas)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: waiting on working setup to verify)
Attachments
(2 files)
2.01 KB,
patch
|
coop
:
review+
Pike
:
review+
nthomas
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.17 KB,
patch
|
nthomas
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The 3 slaves that are in production-1.9.0 need to have their builder names fixed from: linux_l10n_nightly macosx_l10n_nightly win32_l10n_nightly to: Linux fx-1.9.0 l10n nightly? MacOSX 10.4 fx-1.9.0 l10n nightly? Win2k3 fx-1.9.0 l10n nightly? http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showbuilds.cgi?tree=Mozilla-l10n
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Linux mozilla-central l10n nightly and friends would be most consistent.
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
That's not the outcome of the discussion in .build, http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.l10n/browse_frm/thread/0756b9d4987bc2e8
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Okay, I defer to that.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Haven't had time to work on this, putting back to pool
Assignee: armenzg → nobody
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → nthomas
Priority: -- → P2
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
Axel, what are the new names you want here ? Armen's suggestion in comment #0 differs from the "Firefox cvs-1.9.0 linux-i686/mac/win32" style which seems to be preferred in the newsgroup discussion. Also cvs-trunk rather than cvs-1.9.0 ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #350422 -
Flags: review?(ccooper)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 350422 [details] [diff] [review] Use the "%app %repo %platform" style coop, does this fit in with our l10n plans in general ? Axel, this is what you wanted ?
Attachment #350422 -
Flags: review?(l10n)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #350422 -
Flags: review?(l10n) → review+
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 350422 [details] [diff] [review] Use the "%app %repo %platform" style Thanks, looks good to me.
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 350422 [details] [diff] [review] Use the "%app %repo %platform" style WFM
Attachment #350422 -
Flags: review?(ccooper) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 350422 [details] [diff] [review] Use the "%app %repo %platform" style Checking in master.cfg; /cvsroot/mozilla/tools/buildbot-configs/automation/production-1.9/master.cfg,v <-- master.cfg new revision: 1.36; previous revision: 1.35 done And into use on production-1.9-master. Waiting for a new run to verify.
Attachment #350422 -
Flags: checked‑in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
I missed the two other places where *_1l0n_nightly are used, in setting up the reporting to tinderbox.
Attachment #350598 -
Flags: checked‑in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
Can't verify this is working, bug 467196.
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
Firefox cvs-1.9.0 linux-i686 Firefox cvs-1.9.0 mac Firefox cvs-1.9.0 win32 are reporting to Mozilla-l10n and Mozilla-l10n-%locale%
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•