Last Comment Bug 463849 - Port |Bug 211439 - Delete should mark as read (also on POP and IMAP when offline)| to SeaMonkey
: Port |Bug 211439 - Delete should mark as read (also on POP and IMAP when offl...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
:
Product: SeaMonkey
Classification: Client Software
Component: MailNews: Message Display (show other bugs)
: Trunk
: All All
: -- normal (vote)
: seamonkey2.0a2
Assigned To: Jens Hatlak (:InvisibleSmiley)
:
Mentors:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-11-08 15:48 PST by Jens Hatlak (:InvisibleSmiley)
Modified: 2008-11-15 18:19 PST (History)
2 users (show)
See Also:
Crash Signature:
(edit)
QA Whiteboard:
Iteration: ---
Points: ---


Attachments
Port from Bug 211439 (913 bytes, patch)
2008-11-08 15:52 PST, Jens Hatlak (:InvisibleSmiley)
mnyromyr: review+
neil: superreview+
Details | Diff | Review

Description Jens Hatlak (:InvisibleSmiley) 2008-11-08 15:48:55 PST
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 SeaMonkey/1.1.12
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081108 SeaMonkey/2.0a2pre

TB bug 211439 made it so that messages always get marked read when deleted (from POP accounts or local folders; IMAP seems to be handled elsewhere already). I think SM should do the same.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Jens Hatlak (:InvisibleSmiley) 2008-11-08 15:52:53 PST
Created attachment 347102 [details] [diff] [review]
Port from Bug 211439
Comment 2 Karsten Düsterloh 2008-11-13 12:43:12 PST
Comment on attachment 347102 [details] [diff] [review]
Port from Bug 211439

I tend to agree, from personal experience ("How did that unread message go into the trash? Oh, hm, I really deleted it...").
Comment 3 neil@parkwaycc.co.uk 2008-11-14 03:34:59 PST
(In reply to comment #0)
> IMAP seems to be handled elsewhere already
Out of interest, is that just IMAP delete model or move to trash too?
(Also, would be interesting to know if it works with filters or not.)
Comment 4 neil@parkwaycc.co.uk 2008-11-14 03:35:47 PST
Comment on attachment 347102 [details] [diff] [review]
Port from Bug 211439

The old code was bogus anyway because if you were context-deleting a message then the wrong one would get marked as read.
Comment 5 Karsten Düsterloh 2008-11-14 11:27:51 PST
Landed on Hg trunk as <http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/0f29f61153ba>.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.