Created attachment 353514 [details] [diff] [review] patch So a few months ago I had to write a patch in my tree in order to get the layout-debug tool to work again. I didn't file a bug at the time because I wanted to figure out why it had regressed. I still haven't figured it out for sure, but my current theory is that it is a regression from bug 439050. In any case, here's the patch. Requesting Axel's review in case he can tell me (1) whether these changes seem correct and (2) whether the need for them is an expected result of bug 439050.
Attachment #353514 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Comment on attachment 353514 [details] [diff] [review] patch Actually, yes, that's expected. contents.rdf has been deprecated for a while and got removed. r=me. I updated https://developer.mozilla.org/En/JAR_Manifests to reflect that.
Attachment #353514 - Flags: review?(l10n) → review-
Comment on attachment 353514 [details] [diff] [review] patch err, being able to read helps. r+
Attachment #353514 - Flags: review- → review+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.2a1
Fixed on 1.9.1: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1/rev/7578683f4dc0
Target Milestone: mozilla1.9.2a1 → mozilla1.9.1b3
Component: Layout: Misc Code → Layout
Product: Core Graveyard → Core
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.