Closed
Bug 47072
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Limited functionality if stopped while retrieving new page
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Navigation, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: joesv59, Assigned: adamlock)
References
()
Details
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20000728 BuildID: 2000072808 If page loading is aborted at the right moment the current page will stop working. Ie it is no longer possible to follow links. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open up www.cnn.com. 2. Follow one link. 3. Go back to first page. 4. Click another link. 5. Wait for the forward arrow to be greyed out. 6. Click stop before the next page is loadad and the current page is still there. Actual Results: The current page is still visible but no links works. The window is not updated when other windows are moved around in front of it. Expected Results: Links should still work. The window should be updated when moving other windows around in front of it.
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
Conmfirming. I didn't find any duplicate bug but I can't guarantee there isn't one. Reassigning to Docshell which seems to be the most obvious component to blame.
Assignee: asa → adamlock
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Browser-General → Embedding: Docshell
Ever confirmed: true
QA Contact: doronr → adamlock
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Could reproduce on Linux 3009. OS should be all.
Updated•24 years ago
|
OS: Windows 2000 → All
When you say the page is still there, is it *really* the page or just garbage? If you move another window over the browser, does the page refresh or do you get a trail a crap left by the window you dragged over it? If yes, then it's likely that this is a duplicate of bug 5569. Basically, you've managed to hit stop after the document is removed, but before the old one is reloaded. The browser has no content and doesn't do any painting at all. Please confirm.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
No refresh. Would be good if the window could be blanked out instead. I find this behaviour quite confusing.
Okay, it sounds like a duplicate alright, so I'm marking it as such. Jonas, you're right that the content should be blanked out. The problem is that the window is rendered by a content viewer, but if there's no content then there's no content viewer to paint the window, hence its dirty. The other bug will have to figure the best way to fix that one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5569 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
Fine by me. Thank you.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•