Release Notes for Bugzilla 3.2.1

RESOLVED FIXED in Bugzilla 3.2

Status

()

Bugzilla
Documentation
--
blocker
RESOLVED FIXED
10 years ago
10 years ago

People

(Reporter: Max Kanat-Alexander, Assigned: Max Kanat-Alexander)

Tracking

Bugzilla 3.2
Bug Flags:
blocking3.2.1 +

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment, 3 obsolete attachments)

(Assignee)

Description

10 years ago
We need relnotes for 3.2.1.
(Assignee)

Comment 1

10 years ago
Created attachment 355347 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
Assignee: documentation → mkanat
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #355347 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
(Assignee)

Comment 2

10 years ago
Created attachment 355349 [details] [diff] [review]
v2

I fixed a few errors that I noticed in the relnotes and also updated a bit of the wording to be clearer.
Attachment #355347 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #355349 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Attachment #355347 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
(Assignee)

Updated

10 years ago
Flags: blocking3.2.1+

Comment 3

10 years ago
??L哦 历史阶段发了

Updated

10 years ago
Attachment #355349 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+

Comment 4

10 years ago
Comment on attachment 355349 [details] [diff] [review]
v2

>+  <li>If you were using the <code>usemenuforusers</code> parameter,
>+    and a bug was assigned to (or had a QA Contact of) a disabled

a bug -> [% terms.abug %]


>+    user, that field would be reset to the first user in the list when
>+    updating a bug.

Same here.


>+  <li>If you were using the <code>PROJECT</code> environment variable
>+    to have multiple Bugzilla installations using one codebase,

Bugzilla -> [% terms.Bugzilla %] or B<!-- -->ugzilla.


>+  <li>Some versions of the SOAP::Lite Perl module had a bug that caused

Same here.


Otherwise looks good. Don't forget to run runtests.pl -v 9 before checkin. r=LpSolit
(Assignee)

Comment 5

10 years ago
Created attachment 359613 [details] [diff] [review]
v3
Attachment #355349 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #359613 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)

Comment 6

10 years ago
Comment on attachment 359613 [details] [diff] [review]
v3

Could you include my previous review comments, please?
(Assignee)

Comment 7

10 years ago
Created attachment 359729 [details] [diff] [review]
v4

Ah yeah, sorry. Would have been nice to get an r+ and just let me fix them on checkin, though (I could have made more progress with the releases tonight before you wake up).
Attachment #359613 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #359729 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Attachment #359613 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)

Comment 8

10 years ago
Comment on attachment 359729 [details] [diff] [review]
v4

r=LpSolit
Attachment #359729 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+
(Assignee)

Comment 9

10 years ago
Thanks! :-)

Checking in template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl,v  <--  release-notes.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.28; previous revision: 1.27
done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(Assignee)

Comment 10

10 years ago
Oh, and on the 3.2 branch! :-)

Checking in template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl,v  <--  release-notes.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.17.2.12; previous revision: 1.17.2.11
done
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.