Closed
Bug 474520
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
Figure out a policy for reviewing autoconfiguration files
Categories
(Webtools :: ISPDB Server, defect)
Webtools
ISPDB Server
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: davida, Unassigned)
Details
(this is likely not the right component, but nothing else seemed better) We need to find a way to manage the files for autoconfiguration data. More info in a blog post that I'll link here shortly.
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
IMO, with the /database/ in source-control, you could apply policies that are very similar to what we currently do with a code module. Reviews required to enter testing/trunk, super-review (or similar) to enter tags/production/
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → ludovic
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Ok first draf is up at : https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Autoconfiguration_review_policy It just follows what we do now. I think It works and scale with the number of input we get. We'll just need to modify this when we switch to using ispdb directly.
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) > Ok first draf is up at : > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Autoconfiguration_review_policy > > It just follows what we do now. I think It works and scale with the number of > input we get. > > We'll just need to modify this when we switch to using ispdb directly. Hum nobody as anything to say on this ?
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
ludo, there's nothing on that doc. Some of the things to check are already at <https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Thunderbird/Autoconfiguration/FileFormat/HowTo>. You should just reference that and make it mandatory to follow that. Some of the manual checks we currently do are documented as blocking bugs of tracker <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543614>.
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Have we got something complete now for the review policy? It'd be nice if we could close this off.
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Banner (:standard8) from comment #5) > Have we got something complete now for the review policy? It'd be nice if we > could close this off. Not That I know of. Also how will this apply when we get the ispdb webapp working ?
Updated•12 years ago
|
Component: Server Operations → ispdb
QA Contact: server-ops → ispdb
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Component: ispdb → ISPDB Server
Product: Mozilla Messaging → Webtools
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
No assignee, updating the status.
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
No assignee, updating the status.
Comment 11•5 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•