Closed
Bug 475214
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
CSS serialization uses "-x-system-font"
Categories
(Core :: DOM: CSS Object Model, defect, P4)
Core
DOM: CSS Object Model
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.9.2a1
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: dbaron)
References
Details
Attachments
(4 files, 1 obsolete file)
217 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
10.14 KB,
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.65 KB,
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
14.81 KB,
patch
|
bzbarsky
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The parser won't accept -x-system-font, so the serializer shouldn't emit it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
I'm guessing the behavior changed with bug 376075, but I'm also guessing it wasn't that great before either.
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Blocks: jesse-css-grammar-fuzzer
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
New test passes, whereas it failed 3 of 8 (the second and fourth serialization tests, and the fourth getter test) without the patch. Full layout/style mochitests pass.
Attachment #360658 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360658 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 360658 [details] [diff] [review] patch Looks ok, but since no one looks at the return value of GetValueOrImportantValue, do we want to just make it return |const nsCSSValue&| so you don't have to do the comma operator thing here?
Attachment #360658 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360658 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #360658 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360658 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Returning |const nsCSSValue&| rather than |nsCSSValue| doesn't make much sense unless we're returning the same thing that's input (which is dangerous, see 420069) or we just stop checking for the branch that currently has an NS_ERROR in it. I guess I'd lean towards the latter, but I also wouldn't want to do that as part of this patch; it's not a small change.
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Yeah, I was assuming we'd return the value input... Let's not worry about it; I'd forgotten the PGO thing. :(
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Hmm, actually, I also need to check consistence of !important in the ToString code here.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Here's a revised patch that also checks consistency of importance, and adds four additional tests, one of which the old patch failed. It also doesn't use GetValueOrImportantValue.
Attachment #360658 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #360739 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360739 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
And here's a patch to remove GetValueOrImportantValue entirely.
Attachment #360740 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360740 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
... and make the replacement for GetValueOrImportantValue a little less ugly. (The replacement is also faster since the caller always knows the desired importance, and the replacement depends on that whereas GetValueOrImportantValue figured it out.)
Attachment #360741 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360741 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
Note also that a few more of these typesafe wrappers end up used in my multiple-backgrounds patch (bug 322475).
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #360739 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360739 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #360739 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360739 -
Flags: review+
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #360740 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360740 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #360740 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360740 -
Flags: review+
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #360741 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360741 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #360741 -
Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #360741 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/768c8c967b0d http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/461bf98a6426 http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/cfc21a608dcd
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
OS: Mac OS X → All
Priority: -- → P4
Hardware: x86 → All
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.2a1
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → dbaron
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•