Closed Bug 475551 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago
Add .htaccess rules for new in-product help link "private-browsing"
With bug 471753, we'll get a new product help link from Firefox (http://support.mozilla.com/1/%APP%/%VERSION%/%OS%/%LOCALE%/private-browsing) that needs to be directed to the Private+Browsing article.
Destination: http://support.mozilla.com/kb/Private+Browsing?style_mode=inproduct Laura, bug 466125 was assigned to you, so I figured that this one should be yours. Hope that's ok.
Assignee: nobody → laura
Target Milestone: --- → 0.8.3
(In reply to comment #1) > Destination: > http://support.mozilla.com/kb/Private+Browsing?style_mode=inproduct > > Laura, bug 466125 was assigned to you, so I figured that this one should be > yours. Hope that's ok. Actually the destination is http://support.mozilla.com/%LOCALE%/kb/Private+Browsing?style_mode=inproduct
Flags: blocking-firefox3.1? → blocking-firefox3.1+
In trunk r22001, branch r22002. IT will need to run sudo webroot/htaccess.sh in order to update htaccess rules on staging before this can be verified. This step will also be needed in the push bug.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: 0.9 → 0.8.2
The URL field link redirects correctly. -> VERIFIED.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
The URL redirect here seems to work, so I'm not sure if the push-needed keyword is still necessary. Is there more work for this bug?
12 years ago
One question. When click the link in Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090402 Minefield/3.6a1pre (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) ID:20090402045446 I'm getting redirected to the SUMO page. But the content for 3.0 is displayed. That means unless we don't have an equivalent version on SUMO we don't fall back to the latest version but 3.0?
Henrik, I think you want bug 482347.
Stephen, I was running 3.6a1. So my user agent hasn't whether 3.1 nor 3.5. The issue I was talking about is how far should we fall back for Firefox versions where no content is available? Shouldn't it be the last recent official version? I you want I could file a bug on that, so we don't spam this bug.
(In reply to comment #8) > Stephen, I was running 3.6a1. So my user agent hasn't whether 3.1 nor 3.5. The > issue I was talking about is how far should we fall back for Firefox versions > where no content is available? Shouldn't it be the last recent official > version? I you want I could file a bug on that, so we don't spam this bug. Henrik: please do file a bug on that; I'm not sure about future versions (thought I once knew), so it'd be good to have it as a reference; thanks!
Ok, filed as bug 486814 for now and further discussion.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.