Closed
Bug 479997
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Option to manage email addresses on a single "To:", "Cc:", "Bcc:", etc. line in composition window
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Composition, enhancement)
MailNews Core
Composition
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 440377
People
(Reporter: fehe, Unassigned)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008052906 Firefox/3.0 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090224 Lightning/1.0pre Please add an option to handle manage email addresses on a single "To:", "Cc:", "Bcc:", etc (comma or semicolon-separated). line in composition window (like most other email clients). When handling a large recipient list (whether when composing a new email or "reply to all"-responding to one having a large recipient list), the current manner of having each and every address on its own line is very inefficient to work with--especially if one needs to, for instance, copy a block of addresses from "To:" to "Cc:" or quickly delete some addresses. With a large list this of addresses this currently requires a lot of unnecessary scrolling and clicking. The current implementation is reasonable only for very small recipient lists (which my include mailing lists). It gets very laborious beyond that. Reproducible: Always
Component: General → Composition
Product: Thunderbird → MailNews Core
Updated•15 years ago
|
QA Contact: general → composition
Looks like the same as bug 369985 (itself unconfirmed), also similar to MailNews Core bug 440377 comment #2 (again, that one is also unconfirmed).
Whiteboard: dupeme
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
This one is clearer than 369985 confirming
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Hmm, this was confirmed per comment #2 and the duped against bug 440377. Does this imply that you wanted to confirm bug 440377 as well?
Whiteboard: dupeme
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5) > Hmm, this was confirmed per comment #2 and the duped against bug 440377. > Does this imply that you wanted to confirm bug 440377 as well? Yes :-)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•