Closed
Bug 484664
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
test_bug22310.js fails on Windows 2000: unsupported 'gu-IN' locale
Categories
(Core :: Internationalization, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla1.9.2a1
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: smontagu)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: fixed1.9.1, Whiteboard: [fixed1.9.1rc2])
Attachments
(1 file)
1.03 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090322 SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre] (experimental/_m-c_, home, optim default) (W2Ksp4) (http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8d2c566f3256 +http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/573fb4c0ec8b) { Unexpected date format: month name in gu-IN ... *** TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | objdir\mozilla\_tests\xpcshell\test_intl_locale\unit\test_bug22310.js | false == true } Removing |[dt("gu-IN").has("\u0A9C\u0AC2\u0AA8"), "month name in gu-IN"],| makes this test pass.
Flags: wanted1.9.2?
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
What does the following give you in the Error Console? var dts = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/intl/scriptabledateformat;1"] .getService(Components.interfaces.nsIScriptableDateFormat); dts.FormatDateTime("gu-IN", dts.dateFormatLong, dts.timeFormatSeconds, 2008, 6, 30, 12, 56, 34); It gives me "30 જૂન 2008 12:56:34" which is what the test expects.
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms776260.aspx says: 0x0447 Windows XP and later: Gujarati (India) gu-IN Gujr Unicode only
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > It gives me "30 જૂન 2008 12:56:34" which is what the test expects. It gives nothing. With s/gu-IN/fr-fr/, it gives "lundi 30 juin 2008 12:56:34", as expected. (In reply to comment #2) > Windows XP and later Obvious cause :->
Summary: [SeaMonkey] test_bug22310.js fails, (at least on my Windows 2000) → test_bug22310.js fails on Windows 2000: unsupported 'gu-IN' locale
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
No longer blocks: SmTestFail, CcMcBuildIssues
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Serge, can you test this fix (using ta-IN instead of gu-IN)? If this doesn't work either I guess I'll just remove that line of the test. I'm a little surprised that Konkani works and Gujarati doesn't, but there it is.
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > It gives me "30 જૂન 2008 12:56:34" which is what the test expects. > > It gives nothing. It should have given a date in some other language... Seems like a bug.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5) > > It gives nothing. > It should have given a date in some other language... Seems like a bug. I'm not sure if you mean that this is a bug in Gecko or in Windows, but (assuming tentatively that Windows is not falling back to a default locale when given an unsupported locale id code), we could probably do our own fallback during locale parsing.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 368791 [details] [diff] [review] Possible fix [Checkin: Comment 9 & 12] "Windows 2000 and later" ta-IN works for me, as expected :-)
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > > It gives nothing. > > It should have given a date in some other language... Seems like a bug. > > I'm not sure if you mean that this is a bug in Gecko or in Windows, but > (assuming tentatively that Windows is not falling back to a default locale when > given an unsupported locale id code), we could probably do our own fallback > during locale parsing. According to my own bug 474636, nsIScriptableDateFormat has a fallback, which I think it should have. Not sure if it should be provided by Windows or Gecko.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d74e551f46a3
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
V.Fixed, per comment 7.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: wanted1.9.2? → in-testsuite+
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.2a1
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
The test was landed on 1.9.1 without this fix :-( Simon, can you check it in there too?
Whiteboard: [needs 1.9.1 landing]
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 368791 [details] [diff] [review] Possible fix [Checkin: Comment 9 & 12] http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1/rev/b95bb1093f2c
Attachment #368791 -
Attachment description: Possible fix → Possible fix
[Checkin: Comment 9 & 12]
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: fixed1.9.1
Whiteboard: [needs 1.9.1 landing] → [fixed1.9.1rc1+]
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [fixed1.9.1rc1+] → [fixed1.9.1rc2]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•