Closed
Bug 493296
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Activity Manager, gloda: don't mention things w/ 0 messages
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, defect)
Thunderbird
Mail Window Front End
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: davida, Assigned: myk)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
3.26 KB,
patch
|
asuth
:
review+
Bienvenu
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I see in my activity manager: "Indexed 0 messages in <foldername>" That seems unnecessary =)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Yup, I mentioned this in bug 469051, comment 16 and in the code at http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/file/6786ebf24275/mail/components/activity/modules/glodaIndexer.js#l235. I was conflicted about it, but in the end I biased towards reporting this information thinking that perhaps it would help us diagnose problems users report with the gloda indexer. bienvenu also prefers the current behavior per bug 469051, comment 18. I guess it depends on whether users use the Activity Manager more to track normal activity or to troubleshoot aberrant behavior. If the former, it probably doesn't make sense to show these messages; if the latter, it probably does. I don't really have a strong feeling either way and am fine with either. Someone just needs to make a decision.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
At the very least I'd change the words to be "No new messages to index in folder <blah>". But my vote is to not include that, as from a troubleshooting POV we have log4moz, IMO. In general, I think the Activity Manager should try to not be too verbose -- I have another bug i want to file about collapsing delete/move notifications, especially as we can't undo them.
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > I was conflicted about it, but in the end I biased towards reporting this > information thinking that perhaps it would help us diagnose problems users > report with the gloda indexer. bienvenu also prefers the current behavior per > bug 469051, comment 18. Hmm, I was being a little bit facetious :-) it might be nice for me.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Hmm, ok, the preponderance of the evidence suggests that suppressing these events is better overall than showing them. Here's a patch that does that. Holding off requesting for review until I can successfully build with and test this patch (my build is currently failing for an apparently unrelated reason).
Assignee: nobody → myk
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #379684 -
Flags: superreview?(bienvenu)
Attachment #379684 -
Flags: review?(bugmail)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 379684 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1: suppresses gloda indexer events that didn't index messages Tested, and it behaves as expected, so requesting review and super-review.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #379684 -
Flags: review?(bugmail) → review+
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 379684 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1: suppresses gloda indexer events that didn't index messages Thank you for the patch!
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 379684 [details] [diff] [review] patch v1: suppresses gloda indexer events that didn't index messages thx for the patch, Myk.
Attachment #379684 -
Flags: superreview?(bienvenu) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Fixed by changeset http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/ed644c7a353b.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•