Closed Bug 493393 Opened 16 years ago Closed 12 years ago

certutil -H does not explain the -W option

Categories

(NSS :: Tools, defect, P3)

3.12.3
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 571242

People

(Reporter: kashyap.cv, Unassigned)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042708 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.10 Build Identifier: -W option(to change password of the key database) is not listed when we do a certutil -H But the functionality do work fine, if we try to change an existing password of the nss key database by using certutil -W -d /home/user/.mozilla/firefox/xxxxxx.default/ this was observed on version -> nss-tools-3.12.2.0-5.fc10.i386 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Just do a certutil -H Actual Results: -W option(to change password of the key database) is not listed Expected Results: -W option should be listed when a certutil -H command is issued. A user wouldn't know of this option unless he/she visits the mozilla nss url.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Priority: -- → P2
Version: unspecified → 3.12.3
Assignee: nobody → julien.pierre.boogz
Attached patch Fix usageSplinter Review
I thought I had previously reported this bug, but I guess not.
Attachment #378475 - Flags: review?(nelson)
Target Milestone: --- → 3.12.4
Attachment #378475 - Attachment description: Fix usag → Fix usage
Comment on attachment 378475 [details] [diff] [review] Fix usage When displayed, the following line exceeds 80 columns. >+ FPS "%-20s Name of token in which to generate key (default is internal)\n", (also, that line suggests that "internal" is an acceptable value for the option argument.)
Attachment #378475 - Flags: review?(nelson) → review-
Summary: -W option(to change password of the key database) is not listed when we do a certutil -H. But the functionality works → certutil -H does not explain the -W option
Nelson, I just copied and pasted this from the help for -h for other commands. I don't really read it as suggesting that this is a valid value. But it could be changed to say "the default is the internal token" instead.
Also, re: the 80 columns, there are at least 10 pre-existing instances of other lines in the usage that exceed this width. I don't think it shouldn't be a requirement.
Assignee: julien.pierre.boogz → nobody
Priority: P2 → P3
Target Milestone: 3.12.4 → ---
Forward duping since Bug 571242 added the text. Note: the commit message for Bug 571242 incorrectly states it is for Bug 571274.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: