493995 - Possible intermittent test failure in content/test/reftest/optiontext.html

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Core :: Layout, defect)

Description

[Jim Mathies [:jimm]]

REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | file:///e:/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-1.9.1-win32-unittest/build/content/test/reftest/optiontext.html |
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | file:///e:/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-1.9.1-win32-unittest/build/content/test/reftest/optiontext.html |
make: *** [reftest] Error 1
Unknown Error: command finished with exit code: 2


Nothing that's landed seems to be a possible culprit. Will close this out found to be otherwise. The data for the two tests is in the log -

http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox3.5/1242832967.1242841400.3068.gz

Comment 1

[Mark Banner (:standard8)]

http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox3.5/1252572162.1252579541.2128.gz
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | file:///e:/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-1.9.1-win32-unittest/build/content/test/reftest/optiontext.html |

Comment 2

[Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot]

ehsan%mozilla.com
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox3.5/1296557095.1296557839.26578.gz
WINNT 5.2 mozilla-1.9.1 test reftest on 2011/02/01 02:44:55

s: win32-slave45
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | file:///e:/builds/moz2_slave/test/build/reftest/tests/content/test/reftest/optiontext.html |

Comment 3

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=SeaMonkey/1300379107.1300383267.7770.gz
WINNT 5.2 comm-central-trunk debug test reftest on 2011/03/17 09:25:07
{
REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | file:///e:/builds/slave/test/build/reftest/tests/content/test/reftest/optiontext.html | image comparison (==)
...
REFTEST number of differing pixels: 39
}

Comment 4

[Ed Morley [:emorley]]

Mass marking whiteboard:[orange] bugs WFM (to clean up TBPL bug suggestions) that:
* Haven't changed in > 6months
* Whose whiteboard contains none of the strings: {disabled,marked,random,fuzzy,todo,fails,failing,annotated,leave open,time-bomb}
* Passed a (quick) manual inspection of bug summary/whiteboard to ensure they weren't a false positive.

I've also gone through and searched for cases where the whiteboard wasn't labelled correctly after test disabling, by using attachment description & basic comment searches. However if the test for which this bug was about has in fact been disabled/annotated/..., please accept my apologies & reopen/mark the whiteboard appropriately so this doesn't get re-closed in the future (and please ping me via IRC or email so I can try to tweak the saved searches to avoid more edge cases).

Sorry for the spam! Filter on: #FFA500