Closed
Bug 494315
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Reimage and rename old 1.66GHz mac minis
Categories
(mozilla.org Graveyard :: Server Operations, task)
mozilla.org Graveyard
Server Operations
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: joduinn, Assigned: phong)
Details
Turns out the following machines were 1.66GHz, not 1.83GHZ as expected, which means they cannot be used in main pool-of-talos-slaves. Also, they should not be called "rev2".
Please reimage these machines with the "old" Talos ref-image for these o.s., and rename these machines as follows:
talos-rev2-xp05 -> talos-rev1-xp01
talos-rev2-xp06 -> talos-rev1-xp02
talos-rev2-xp07 -> talos-rev1-xp03
talos-rev2-xp08 -> talos-rev1-xp04
talos-rev2-vista05 -> talos-rev1-vista01
talos-rev2-vista06 -> talos-rev1-vista02
talos-rev2-vista07 -> talos-rev1-vista03
talos-rev2-vista08 -> talos-rev1-vista04
talos-rev2-linux03 -> talos-rev1-linux01
talos-rev2-linux04 -> talos-rev1-linux02
talos-rev2-linux05 -> talos-rev1-linux03
talos-rev2-linux06 -> talos-rev1-linux04
talos-rev2-tiger03 -> talos-rev1-tiger01
talos-rev2-tiger04 -> talos-rev1-tiger02
talos-rev2-tiger05 -> talos-rev1-tiger03
talos-rev2-tiger06 -> talos-rev1-tiger04
This rename will also mean changes to nagios, inventory and DNS for all of these machines.
As these are all now in staging, you can start this whenever you have time.
(Sorry for the extra work, we really didnt expect these to be 1.66GHz, and are scrambling elsewhere to cleanup data.)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Do we really need to re-image these with the old Talos Image? They were never re-image with the new image to begin with?
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: server-ops → phong
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Do we really need to re-image these with the old Talos Image? They were never
> re-image with the new image to begin with?
I know these were not reimaged today. However, while working on these during today's downtime, we found differences of what software is installed on these machines. Reimaging with the old talos image is easiest/best way to guarantee each machine for a given o.s. is truly identical.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
dns updated.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
can these be re-imaged now?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
talos-rev1-tiger02, and talos-rev1-linux02 are ready.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
talos-rev1-tiger01, talos-rev1-linux03/04 are ready.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
talos-rev1-tiger03/04 are ready.
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
I think there's an error with one of the vista machines, I don't see talos-rev1-vista03, but I see two vista02 slaves.
talos-rev1-vista02.mozilla.org A 10.2.73.47
talos-rev1-vista02.mozilla.org A 10.2.73.48
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
I haven't re-imaged any of the vista minis yet.
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
I think it's the DNS that's messed up right now.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
dns corrected.
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
What's left here? Re-imaging the bulk of that list still? Are we gated on you giving the okay?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #12)
> What's left here? Re-imaging the bulk of that list still? Are we gated on you
> giving the okay?
Some are already reimaged, but the rest still need to be reimaged.
Wasnt aware of needing to give an okay for the remainder machines, but "okay". :-)
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
Phong, you have an ETA on these?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
the rest have been re-imaged with the old image.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•