Bug 454829 changed the structure of the message pane to include an extra vbox. This means the notification bar now appears at the bottom of the message pane because its not hooking in the right place. See attached screenshot.
Assignee: nobody → mschroeder
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #380931 - Flags: review?(bugzilla)
Sounds like Lightning will not work correctly in Thunderbird 3.0 Beta 2 after the patch anymore. Drop support for it and raise required Thunderbird version to 3.0b3pre?
Comment on attachment 380931 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v1 r=me by inspection. I agree with Stefan's comment that you should update the min thunderbird version as well - without that, loading latest lightning into builds before TB changed will place the notification bar at the bottom.
Attachment #380931 - Flags: review?(bugzilla) → review+
Thanks for the heads-up. I adjusted the minVersion as suggested. Pushed to comm-central <http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/8f47b438d34b> -> FIXED
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 1.0
<vbox id="singlemessage" insertbefore="msgHeaderView"> should allow the lightning bar to work in builds before 3.0b3pre as well as after.
This is not fixed for the standalone message window because the <vbox id="singlemessage" flex="1"> is missing (messageWindow.xul). Mark, is it sensible to ask for an alignment of the messagepanebox in messenger.xul and messageWindow.xul, so we can easily overlay both with the same piece of xul?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Makes sense to me. I'm happy to whip up a patch if mark thinks it's ok.
(In reply to comment #6) > This is not fixed for the standalone message window because the <vbox > id="singlemessage" flex="1"> is missing (messageWindow.xul). > > Mark, is it sensible to ask for an alignment of the messagepanebox in > messenger.xul and messageWindow.xul, so we can easily overlay both with the > same piece of xul? I can't see that being a problem, it makes sense to keep them similar for extensions.
I should have tried Philip's suggestion from comment#5 before my last comment... this is also the solution for my problem in comment#6. But i think it's okay to leave the minVersion at 3.0b3pre, right?
Attachment #381404 - Flags: review?(bugzilla)
If the solution works in both Thunderbird 3.0b2 and 3.0b3pre I'd reset the min version down to 3.0b2 to not loose feedback from the Lightning nightly testers using 3.0b2 until 3.0b3 is released.
Comment on attachment 381404 [details] [diff] [review] Fix for overlaying messageWindow.xul Looks good, r=Standard8. Allowing 3.0b2 again could be a good idea as we haven't released b3 yet. Though if you start using some of the new tab features on other bugs, then you may find you're broken against b2 again, but I suspect that could be a few weeks off.
Attachment #381404 - Flags: review?(bugzilla) → review+
I reset the minVersion to b2 as suggested. Pushed to comm-central <http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/096acd1ed9b2> -> FIXED
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago → 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
These bugs are likely targeted at Lightning 1.0b1, not Lightning 1.0. If this change was done in error, please adjust the target milestone to its correct value. To filter on this bugspam, you can use "lightning-10-target-move".
Target Milestone: 1.0 → 1.0b1
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.