Closed
Bug 495999
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Paused download label shown in status bar when leaving PB with active downloads
Categories
(Firefox :: Private Browsing, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 3.6a1
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| status1.9.1 | --- | wontfix |
People
(Reporter: sylvain.pasche, Assigned: ehsan.akhgari)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
12.73 KB,
patch
|
mconnor
:
review+
dveditz
:
approval1.9.1.3-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
STR:
1. Start Private Browsing
2. Start one download that is large enough so that you can stop PB with the download still being active.
3. Stop PB with the download still active.
Result:
"One paused download" label is visible in the status bar, but there is no paused download if you open the Downloads window.
Expected:
No such label should be visible, the downloads are apparently canceled when leaving PB.
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Confirmed in latest branch and trunk
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090602 Shiretoko/3.5pre
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090602 Minefield/3.6a1pre
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86_64 → All
Summary: Paused download label shows in status bar when leaving PB with active downloads. → Paused download label shown in status bar when leaving PB with active downloads
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Nominating for blocker (new feature + tossing it on the radar)
Flags: blocking-firefox3.5?
I don't that this blocks 3.5 but what would be interesting is this a regression? I think we haven't seen this in the past.
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
I haven't seen this previously, so my hunch is it might be...
(In reply to comment #3)
> I don't that this blocks 3.5 but what would be interesting is this a
> regression? I think we haven't seen this in the past.
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Regression range would help, then. Whimboo was right; not blocking release.
Flags: wanted1.9.1.x+
Flags: blocking-firefox3.5?
Flags: blocking-firefox3.5-
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
Ehsan, it looks like that this really happens since the beginning. Don't we clear out the statusbar yet?
Version: Trunk → 3.5 Branch
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Yeah, this is most certainly not a regression, because I don't remember fixing it at all in the first place! ;-)
Taking, patch forthcoming.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
Same patch code-wise, but this time with a test.
Attachment #381287 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #381301 -
Flags: review?(mconnor)
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
Is mconnor still the right reviewer here?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10)
> Is mconnor still the right reviewer here?
Yes, he's the only possible reviewer.
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 381301 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch + test
>+
>+ setTimeout(function () {
>+ if (DownloadMonitorPanel.inited())
>+ DownloadMonitorPanel.updateStatus();
>+ }, 0);
> },
should we just make updateStatus check inited/call init() if something starts early? Might be cleaner. r=me either way.
Attachment #381301 -
Flags: review?(mconnor) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
I made updateStatus bail out if inited returns false. It can't call init itself because the download manager service is initialized in the delayedStartup function.
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d0dadd3b71bb
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [needs r=mconnor]
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 3.6a1
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #381301 -
Flags: approval1.9.1.3?
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
Verified FIXED on trunk
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090802 Minefield/3.6a1pre
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 381301 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch + test
Doesn't seem like the kind of fix we have to take on the stable branch. 1.9.1 approval denied.
Attachment #381301 -
Flags: approval1.9.1.3? → approval1.9.1.3-
Updated•16 years ago
|
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•