496549 - relbranch names should have a finer resolution than 1 day

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P5)

Description

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Today we came very close to relbranch'ing for 3.5b99, and then later in that same day (according to pst), needing to relbranch for 3.5rc1. Had we had to do this, I'm not sure how we would've dealt with 3.5rc1 wanting to use the same relbranch as 3.5b99. Using a resolution of HH in the relbranch name should help a bunch with this

Comment 1

[Chris Cooper [:coop] (he/him)]

Mass move of bugs from Release Engineering:Future -> Release Engineering. See
http://coop.deadsquid.com/2010/02/kiss-the-future-goodbye/ for more details.

Comment 2

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Attachment: put hour in relbranch

I *think* this is all that's required here...

Comment 3

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Comment on attachment 437073 [details] [diff] [review]
put hour in relbranch

This patch seems correct. We should run this by drivers before landing, though.

Comment 4

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Comment on attachment 437073 [details] [diff] [review]
put hour in relbranch

I've long since been fine with this patch, but please update the comment on landing, and make sure drivers are aware of this change.

Comment 5

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

Attachment: put hour in relbranch

refreshing patch, after nthomas noted factory.py has been rewritten.

Comment 6

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Comment on attachment 496390 [details]
put hour in relbranch

Looks fine to me.

Rail, are you comfortable taking this in b8?

Comment 7

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

Comment on attachment 496390 [details]
put hour in relbranch

changeset:   1899:3e241e8f7558

Comment 8

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

(In reply to comment #7)
> Comment on attachment 496390 [details]
> put hour in relbranch
> 
> changeset:   1899:3e241e8f7558

Nice.