497216 - UI does not match - individual test cases both show in same subgroup

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Webtools Graveyard :: Litmus, defect, P2)

Description

[Marcia Knous [:marcia]]

Attachment: Screenshot of Test case in view mode

whimboo noticed in the Private Browsing area that test cases are showing up in the same subgroup (x2 in BFTs, for example) yet in another view they show correctly.

This is causing confusion since it appears incorrect in the individual test case view.

See attached screenshots.

Comment 1

[Marcia Knous [:marcia]]

Attachment: Correct screenshot of Test Case in View mode

Comment 2

[Marcia Knous [:marcia]]

Attachment: Same test case show in Edit mode

Notice how in Edit mode the test case is showing up in the same subgroup x2

Comment 3

[Chris Cooper [:coop] (he/him)]

Which testcase is this specifically? The ID would help.

Comment 4

[Chris Cooper [:coop] (he/him)]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Which testcase is this specifically? The ID would help.

Nevermind, it's visible in the other screenshot (7394).

Comment 5

[Chris Cooper [:coop] (he/him)]

It looks like the interface is getting confused because the same subgroup (FX 3.5 FFT - Private Browsing (1139)) is being re-used by both the FFT and the BFT.

Comment 6

[Marcia Knous [:marcia]]

Okay, it appears that back when the PB subgroup was created somehow a a Private Browsing BFT group did not get created - most likely I am to blame since I own that section. I created a BFT subgroup (Subgroup ID #: 1200) for PB but I will not be able to fix the test cases until I get back into town next week.

Comment 7

[Chris Cooper [:coop] (he/him)]

I have a fix in place locally, but want to do some testing around it to make sure it hasn't broken anything else.

Comment 8

[Chris Cooper [:coop] (he/him)]

(In reply to comment #6)
> Okay, it appears that back when the PB subgroup was created somehow a a Private
> Browsing BFT group did not get created - most likely I am to blame since I own
> that section. I created a BFT subgroup (Subgroup ID #: 1200) for PB but I will
> not be able to fix the test cases until I get back into town next week.

Yeah, that's good practice, but the new patch will allow for shared subgroups if that's the way you want to go.

changeset:   534:787cc83a2c47

Comment 9

[Chris Cooper [:coop] (he/him)]

Sigh, logic inversion.

changeset:   535:5701f134dc88

BTW, I've created/populated the subgroup "3.5 BFT - Private Browsing (1201)." It has the same testcases as the FFT, which is probably too many. Someone should pare it down at some point.