User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090619 Minefield/3.6a1pre Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090619 Minefield/3.6a1pre Extensions must now include a license with each version, but the Mozilla Tri-License, a very popular license type, is not offered in the drop down. It would make it a lot easier for developers if they didn't have to put it in the "Other" option. Reproducible: Always
Nevermind, that's MPL not tri-license. :)
I thought this was left out on purpose but I wasn't in on the details. CCing people who were
the importance of this bug should be more than just "enhancement", perhaps "minor", all mozilla code is tri-licensed, the extensions on AMO should have the possibility to use this option easily as well.
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***
I can't find the other bug, but this is a dupe of a wontfix. There is an "other" field which can be used for this. We didn't want to add this because it's actually 3 licenses that we'd have to list on the page (with links to each) which is a special case.