Closed
Bug 501945
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Should treat nightly testers as Firefox 3.5 users for purpose of ad badges
Categories
(Websites Graveyard :: spreadfirefox.com, defect)
Websites Graveyard
spreadfirefox.com
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: hsivonen, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: affiliates)
Attachments
(1 file)
|
2.42 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Steps to reproduce:
1) Load http://www.spreadfirefox.com/affiliates/utw in a trunk nightly, self built Minefield or a tryserver build.
Actual results:
"You are settling for good when there is awesome."
Expected results.
"You rock."
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
I agree that this is misleading for nightly testers. Maybe we could show the Firefox 3.5 banner to anyone with a Firefox version >= 3.5?
Updated•16 years ago
|
Whiteboard: affiliates
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Simple patch that checks that the version of Firefox or Minefield is >= the desired version for the badge.
Updated•15 years ago
|
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Hey there: I think Sam is out this week. Buchanan: Is this something you can help with?
Mary
| Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Product: Websites → Websites Graveyard
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 466231 [details] [diff] [review]
Treat Minefield and Firefox betas more appropriately
Removing review request since the new affiliate website https://affiliates.mozilla.org) seems to just use images.
Attachment #466231 -
Flags: review?(buchanae+bugs)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: mnoorenberghe+bmo → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed: false
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
The current affiliate website doesn't even seem to mention a Firefox version... Is this bug still valid...?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Cykesiopka from comment #5)
> The current affiliate website doesn't even seem to mention a Firefox
> version... Is this bug still valid...?
Unclear, since I don't have the ancient Firefox affiliate image URLs at hand, so I can't check what images they serve now.
(Sites out there could still include those images. I got rid of the image on my site, when it became too embarrassing that the Mozilla side serving those images wasn't being maintained appropriately in the light of Rapid Release.)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Effectively WONTFIXed since graveyarded.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•