Closed
Bug 504481
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
recommended but incompatible addons have inconsistent wording
Categories
(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Public Pages, enhancement, P5)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
5.8
People
(Reporter: joe, Assigned: jbalogh)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [z][bonus])
Attachments
(1 file)
10.89 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
If you find a recommended addon that is incompatible with the software you're currently using, AMO appears to recommend to you that you ignore the version check. Maybe if the addon is incompatible it shouldn't be highlighted as recommended?
Updated•15 years ago
|
OS: Mac OS X → All
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Nick, what do you want to do here?
Assignee: nobody → nnguyen
Depends on: 498825
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
I think it's ok to say it's still recommended, since it is, despite being incompatible. It might encourage someone to upgrade to the proper version of Firefox to install if they're on an older version. I don't think there's a huge risk of going the other way.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
(In reply to comment #2)
> I think it's ok to say it's still recommended, since it is, despite being
> incompatible.
You are misunderstanding the problem reported here. The problem is that it reads as if ignoring the version checking is recommended. See the screenshot in comment 0. Reopening.
If you think it is still ok after you understand the reported issue, please mark it as Wontfix again.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Also, when you aren't logged in it just says "This add-on is for older versions of Firefox
recommended"
and this is really confusing if there is nothing to install or click on.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
Priority: -- → P5
Target Milestone: --- → 5.6
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
If it's not compatible, let's not show the "recommended" text or color.
Assignee: nnguyen → nobody
Whiteboard: [z]
Target Milestone: 5.6 → 4.x (triaged)
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
There are 2 issues at odds here in our current design:
1. Recommended add-ons are editorially picked and should always be identifiable. (see bug 496286)
2. We should not recommend add-ons that are incompatible to a user. (I realize that this bug is about the specific confusing wording, but it's part of a larger issue)
If the recommended flag was not right on the install button, this would be less of an issue. Even if the wording was not confusing about ignoring the version check, I think having the recommended flag on an incompatible button at all is not good.
I'm going to note this bug for us to figure out in zamboni -- I think we may need to look into a different design of the recommended flag, and possibly switch to "featured" instead of "recommended".
Assignee: nobody → fligtar
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
There are designs for how this will be fixed in bug 544508.
Depends on: 544508
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
This will be fixed with new install buttons in bug 544508.
Assignee: fligtar → nobody
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Target Milestone: 4.x (triaged) → 5.8
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: in-litmus+
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [z] → [z][bonus]
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
[bonus] via bug 544508.
Assignee: nobody → jbalogh
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago → 15 years ago
Hardware: x86 → All
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Version: unspecified → 4.x
Updated•9 years ago
|
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•