504626 - mochitest-plain: /content/events/test/test_bug299673.html fails

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Core :: DOM: UI Events & Focus Handling, defect)

Description

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090715
SeaMonkey/2.0b1pre] (experimental/_m-c_, home, optim default) (W2Ksp4)
(http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c575412d976a [20090623]
 +http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/16d18598cb19)
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090715 SeaMonkey/2.1a1pre] (home, optim default) (W2Ksp4)
(http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d190d9b6ccd1
 +http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/773809454cf2 + bug 503724 patch)

{
17981 INFO Running /tests/content/events/test/test_bug299673.html...
... | select element should be focused
... | input element in popup should be focused
... | input element in popup did not accept input
... | wrong element is focused after popup was closed

... | unexpected events - got " :  Test with browser.link.open_newwindow = 3\n: focus top-doc\nSELECT(Select1): focus \nSELECT(Select1): change \n :  >>> OpenWindow\n: blur top-doc\n: focus popup-doc\nINPUT(popupText1): focus \n :  <<< OpenWindow\nSELECT(Select1): blur \n", expected " :  Test with browser.link.open_newwindow = 3\n: focus top-doc\nSELECT(Select1): focus \nSELECT(Select1): change \n :  >>> OpenWindow\n: blur top-doc\nINPUT(popupText1): focus \n :  <<< OpenWindow\nSELECT(Select1): blur \nINPUT(popupText1): blur \n: blur popup-doc\n: focus top-doc\n"

... | select element should be focused
... | input element in popup should be focused
... | input element in popup did not accept input
... | wrong element is focused after popup was closed

... | unexpected events - got " :  Test with browser.link.open_newwindow = 2\nINPUT(popupText1): blur \n: blur popup-doc\n: focus top-doc\nSELECT(Select1): focus \nSELECT(Select1): change \n :  >>> OpenWindow\n: blur top-doc\n: focus popup-doc\nINPUT(popupText1): focus \n :  <<< OpenWindow\nSELECT(Select1): blur \n", expected " :  Test with browser.link.open_newwindow = 2\nSELECT(Select1): focus \nSELECT(Select1): change \n :  >>> OpenWindow\n: blur top-doc\n: focus popup-doc\nINPUT(popupText1): focus \n :  <<< OpenWindow\nSELECT(Select1): blur \n"
}

Comment 1

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Fwiw, it may be related to bug 178324 and bug 497839!?

Comment 2

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

(In reply to comment #1)
> bug 497839?

Not that one: fails even when having focus. Sorry.

Comment 3

[Timothy Nikkel (:tnikkel)]

http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox3.6-Unittest/1259882767.1259886641.26904.gz

Comment 4

[Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot]

Standard8
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox3.6/1281127500.1281130680.21036.gz
Linux mozilla-1.9.2 test mochitests on 2010/08/06 13:45:00

s: moz2-linux-slave09
29951 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/content/events/test/test_bug299673.html | unexpected events - got " :  Test with browser.link.open_newwindow = 3\nSELECT(Select1): focus \nSELECT(Select1): change \n :  >>> OpenWindow\n: blur top-doc\nINPUT(popupText1): focus \n :  <<< OpenWindow\nSELECT(Select1): blur \nINPUT(popupText1): blur \n: blur popup-doc\n: focus top-doc\n", expected " :  Test with browser.link.open_newwindow = 3\n: focus top-doc\nSELECT(Select1): focus \nSELECT(Select1): change \n :  >>> OpenWindow\n: blur top-doc\nINPUT(popupText1): focus \n :  <<< OpenWindow\nSELECT(Select1): blur \nINPUT(popupText1): blur \n: blur popup-doc\n: focus top-doc\n"

Comment 5

[Mark Banner (:standard8)]

Probably quite rare, but looks to be not SM only.

Comment 6

[Ed Morley [:emorley]]

Mass marking whiteboard:[orange] bugs WFM (to clean up TBPL bug suggestions) that:
* Haven't changed in > 6months
* Whose whiteboard contains none of the strings: {disabled,marked,random,fuzzy,todo,fails,failing,annotated,leave open,time-bomb}
* Passed a (quick) manual inspection of bug summary/whiteboard to ensure they weren't a false positive.

I've also gone through and searched for cases where the whiteboard wasn't labelled correctly after test disabling, by using attachment description & basic comment searches. However if the test for which this bug was about has in fact been disabled/annotated/..., please accept my apologies & reopen/mark the whiteboard appropriately so this doesn't get re-closed in the future (and please ping me via IRC or email so I can try to tweak the saved searches to avoid more edge cases).

Sorry for the spam! Filter on: #FFA500