Closed
Bug 51247
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Test harness for NIST DOM test suite does not work in Mozilla
Categories
(Core :: XML, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: nisheeth_mozilla, Assigned: desale)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: helpwanted)
Attachments
(1 file)
30.35 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
- Go to the above URL. - Type http://home.houston.rr.com/curta/japanese.xml in the test suite input field. Actual Result: The browser hangs. Expected Result: The tests specified in the japanese.xml files should run and the page should get updated dynamically with the test results.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
More comments from Curt Arnold (carnold@houston.rr.com) who patched NIST's test harness to try to get it to work in Mozilla: <EMAIL> Here are the problems that I needed to work around: 1. mozconf.xml (a XHTML variant of template.xml) did not display correctly when the extension was .xml, but did when it was .html. Radio button labels did not appear and centering or borders of tables were different. 2. Mozilla would not display an .XHTML file that only specified a public identifier in its doctype. 3. Lack of Javascript debugging capability meant that most development had to be done with IE and InterDev. Not being able (or at least not knowing how) to parse an XML file from JavaScript in Netscape 4.x prevented using its JavaScript debugger. 4. Switching to HTML caused the processing instructions to disappear from IE5's DOM meaning that I had to find a substitute for the template markers (I used <div title="?target data"> in its place, but that it probably why the IE5 version runs the tests but doesn't display the tables) 5. Asynchronous parsing required some massive reorganization of the code and caused the IE5 variant to crash to large test suites (could run japanese.xml but crashed on xmltest.xml). If synch parsing is added, then mozconf.js (a variant of harness.js) should be rederived from harness.js and the current form abandoned. My though would be just to add a optional boolean to the load method: document.implementation.load(uri,"text/xml",true); One implementation detail could be the load event handling. If it is difficult to fire the "load" and related events with synch parsing, I'd just say synch parsing fires no events. I've put copies of ie5conf.html, ie5conf.js, mozconf.html, mozconf.xml (to show rendering issues) and mozconf.js to http://home.houston.rr.com/curta/ In its current state, it should go in the CVS somewhere (/xml/mozilla?) with disclaimers that it is an early work in progress. You can run it from the site, type http://home.houston.rr.com/curta/japanese.xml in the test suite field and press run. It should display a few diagnostic messages and then return a number to tests passed that is consistent with the console javascript version. Attempting to run the suite from Mozilla causes a lock up, but before any XML specific code is encountered. Even if it is abandoned due to better scripts from the Netscape team, it does show problems that people would have bring significant XML code to the Mozilla platform. </EMAIL> Marking qawanted and helpwanted. QA work needed: test and file new bugs for the mozilla related problems mentioned in Curt's email Development work needed: Fix this bug so that we can get the NIST test suite to work in Mozilla. A big thank you to Curt for attempting this port to Mozilla!
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3-]
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
I want to talk to Eric Krock before making a decision on whether this is a beta 3 candidate. Removing the nsbeta3- marker from the status whiteboard.
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3-]
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Question: Is using the XMLExtras facilities for parsing and synchronous loading an acceptable solution to some of the problems seen?
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
A quick review of mozconf.js shows that in line 140, inside of the test for a PI, there is the following code: 140: child = xmlcode.nextChild; xmlcode should be xmlnode (defined in line 139) and nextChild should be nextSibling. This results in child being undefined resulting an infinite loop since the test at line 121 tests child against null. I haven't looked at the logic to see if it is correct though.
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
I did a quick hack on Brownell's original IE5 test suite using synchronous XMLHttpRequest calls for both IE and Mozilla. It isn't complete yet since I have yet to remove all of his IE dependent node navigation but I have learned a some things. 1. IE's XMLHttpRequest object does not expand Entities so the OASIS xmlconf.xml file can not be used, although you can iterate through the individual xml test files. There may be some complications due to the need to consolidate the test results but I don't think it is insurmountable. I don't think the xmlextra version of XMLHttpRequest expands entities either although I may be wrong about that. Is there a programmatic way of expanding the entities defined in xmlconf.xml? 2. There is no way in either XMLHttpRequest object to specify validating vs. non-validating as far as I can tell. You can specify validating on the IE XML parser, but the xmlextras parser only handles strings... so that is out (for now). 3. It would really be nice if xmlextras XMLParser supported loading synchronously from files *and* allowed validation to be specified. Even the emptyDocument.load method would be cool *if* it supported synchronous calls and specification of validating or non-validating parses. As it stands, it appears that a cross-browser (Mozilla/IE5.5) non-validating XML parser test can be completed using synchronous XMLHttpRequest objects.
Taking.
Assignee: nisheeth → heikki
The URL is no longer valid. I changed it to the official NIST DOM test suite page. The page does not cause a hang, but I do not see any tests to run either. It seems NIST is also working on making the tests run in Mozilla. I have sent an email asking if I could help them.
Summary: Test harness for NIST DOM test suite hangs in Mozilla → Test harness for NIST DOM test suite does not work in Mozilla
There seems to be a hacked version of the NIST DOM test suite at SourceForge that should work in MSXML3, Adobe's SVG viewer and Xerces-COM. It still does not work in Mozilla :/ http://xmlconf.sourceforge.net/dom1/ecmascript/
NIST is working on making their test suites work with Mozilla. DOM test suite should take maybe 3 more weeks, after which they might request our help in test harness or some such. Unless there are some code level changes required to make the tests work after they are done, I don't think I am the correct owner for this bug. Assigning to Prashant, QA for XML DOM. The test suite is big, so if they request help it would be in our interests to get it working. This suite would also help in shaking out the bugs introduced with the landing of the DOM conversion jst and jband are working on. ETA sometime during 0.9.1.
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
any update on the test suite or bug fixing that might be needed to run the tests? I'm going to unset the target milestone until we here more. lets reset as soon as we learn the tests are available.
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.1 → ---
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
I've been working with the NIST/W3C DOM Test Suite effort and have finally gotten the suite to run with Mozilla 0.9.3. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom-ts/2001Sep/0005.html
This is really good news! Johnny, could you look at the testcases that crash (3) or cause other problems? Anyone else, now that there are tests that run, wanna jump in to help make them better (there are some kludgles needed for Mozilla)?
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
I downloaded the NIST DOM Suite and I will hopfully be able to debug the three tests that hang/crash mozilla (they still do). Most of the tests we fail come from the following problems: 1) General suckiness of attribute node support 2) document.createEntityReference isn't implemented 3) document.doctype is null for XML documents with no doctype (but isn't that correct per DOM1 Core spec? The test suite seems to think it's wrong) 4) Lack of entity nodes support I'll look into the problems more deeply another day.
Could we get a status update on this, has this been done already?
Comment 17•23 years ago
|
||
This is part of the W3C DOM TS now afaik. It now uses jsUnit. There has been work to upgrade jsUnit to be cross browser and to modify the DOM TS to be more cross browser as well. See recent posts to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom-ts/ for an update.
Updated•22 years ago
|
QA Contact: petersen → rakeshmishra
Updated•21 years ago
|
QA Contact: rakeshmishra → ashishbhatt
Comment 18•21 years ago
|
||
I've been running the DOM TS for a while now.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•