Closed
Bug 513013
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Reject/Approve UI needs some visual adjustments
Categories
(support.mozilla.org :: General, defect)
support.mozilla.org
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
1.4
People
(Reporter: paulc, Assigned: paulc)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: tiki_bug, tiki_upstreamed)
Attachments
(1 file)
1.16 KB,
patch
|
jsocol
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Apparently, in some circumstances, the text box for rejecting does not wrap to the next line, and falls on the same line as the label. Also, David mentioned some wording changes in bug 446082 comment 28.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
I find changing the approval box label to "Message to author" inconsistent with "Reason for rejecting" -- so I think we either change both to match or neither. Waiting on David for this.
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
If you reject an edit, you have to have a good reason for it, hence "Reason for rejecting (will be e-mailed to author):". However, if you approve an edit, do you need a reason for that? It feels artificial to ask for a reason for it. However, you might have feedback to the author, e.g. "Great edit, thanks! I've approved it, but for the future, could you blah blah?" My suggestion is "Feedback to the author (optional):" Chris, do you agree here?
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
use-cases for that text field are to: * say thanks * tell the contributor of any tweaks you are going to make to their edit * invite them the contributors forum Sometimes all three. :-) I agree with "Feedback to the author (optional):"
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
This renames the approve option and adds a line break for the reject option. As David said, we can leave the javascript policy for contributors for later.
Attachment #397738 -
Flags: review?(laura)
Updated•15 years ago
|
Target Milestone: 1.3 → 1.4
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #397738 -
Flags: review?(laura) → review?(jsocol)
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 397738 [details] [diff] [review] patch, v1 Looks good to me. Thanks for adding that <br/>
Attachment #397738 -
Flags: review?(jsocol) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
r50801 / r50802
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Verified FIXED -- suggestions in comment 2 have been implemented.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: tiki_bug
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Turns out the feedback form was entirely missing. Upstreamed it.
Whiteboard: tiki_bug → tiki_bug, tiki_upstreamed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•