Open
Bug 520446
Opened 15 years ago
Updated 12 years ago
Inconsistent way of defining time ranges on searches
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Query/Bug List, defect)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: gerv, Unassigned)
Details
The searches you can do across time ranges seem to be divided between some which are before/after (i.e. < and >) and some which are from/to (i.e. >= and <=). http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsblame.cgi?file=mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Search.pm Line 429: chfieldfrom/to: <= >= Line 539: deadlinefrom/to: <= >= Line 1411: comment before/after: < > Line 1563: worktime before/after: < > Line 1717: attachments before/after: < > Line 2208: generic before/after: < > This is a shame. Additionally, the from/to terminology is ambiguous in the "changed field" case - does "chfieldto" indicate the upper bound of the time range, or the new value? Is it worth fixing this, and standardising on before/after terminology? (We can put in +1 / -1 hacks and still support old field names, as has been done on line 414 for the legacy "changedin" field. Gerv
Updated•15 years ago
|
Severity: normal → minor
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•